Interview Staff Martin Kerr

transcript of an interview between NEW ORDER Chief of Staff Martin Kerr and Rosmarie Macleod, host of the online broadcast The Voice of National Socialist Reason. This interview took place on November 4, 2018, on Mixlr, at

Martin Kerr at the NSWPP headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, 1981.

ROSEMARIE MACLEOD: Tell us a little bit about your background. How did you get involved in the Movement?

MARTIN KERR: I was born in Pennsylvania in 1952. May ancestors were of Scottish, English and German descent, and helped to settle the state. When I was three or four years old, our family moved to New Jersey. I grew up is a small White suburban community about 20 miles outside of New York City. I had a safe and comfortable middleclass existence. I attended public schools and the local Presbyterian church.

I first became interested in National Socialism in 1966, when I was 14 years old. I was aware, through reading the newspapers and watching the news on television, that American society was facing many problems, including racial unrest, the spread of communism and the war in Vietnam. It was also apparent to me that the solutions to these problems did not consist of those offered by democracy, capitalism or the churches – they were the very ones who had allowed the problems to arise in the first place! So I was casting about for solutions.

I read an interview with George Lincoln Rockwell and was very impressed by his honesty. Here was someone who was tackling the problems that we were facing – especially racial problems – in a direct and forthright manner. We didn’t use the term back then, but today we would say that he was “thinking outside the box.” I wrote to Commander Rockwell and asked him if I could join the American Nazi Party. Within a week I had received an answer in the mail, and I promptly signed up in the party’s youth wing, the National Socialist Youth Movement, which was the same as the Hitler Youth.

As you can imagine, my parents were unhappy with this development, and they prevented any further involvement by me in National Socialist politics for the time being. However, I kept my National Socialist faith, and by my junior year in high school I was attending meetings and demonstrations of the National Renaissance Party in New York City.

I was one on the founding associates when party commander Matt Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. In Commander Koehl’s last will, he indicated that he wanted me to follow him as the leader of the NEW ORDER. I have been in charge of NEW ORDER operations since his death in October 2014. I formally re-affiliated with the NSWPP in 1971. From 1973 through 1977 I served with the Los Angeles Unit of the party. From June 1977 until 1984 I worked at the party’s national headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. My primary responsibility there was public outreach, in particular, editing the party’s written publications.

RM: Different people have different definitions of National Socialism. What does it mean to you?

MK: There are different levels to National Socialism. What most people understand by the term is its superstructure, that is to say its outward policies and form. In that sense, National Socialism is a dynamic racial movement that seeks to safeguard and advance the interests and welfare of White people both here in the US and worldwide.

Using Hitler’s Germany as a model, the NEW ORDER seeks to create a National Socialist state for White Americans. Now, it is not the case that we are trying to replicate the Third Reich on American soil, in the sense of copying it identically in every little detail. Rather, our goal is to apply basic National Socialist principles in an American context, taking into account America’s history, its racial and ethnic demographics, and its geography, as well as the unique character of the American personality.

But underneath this political superstructure rests the philosophical basis of National Socialism, which does not change over time, or from one country to the next.

National Socialism is a worldview, or a Weltanschauung, to use the German term. We believe that the Universe is governed by natural laws. For Man to be healthy and prosperous, he must first acknowledge that these laws exist; secondly, he must discern what they are; and finally, he must follow them. This process is true both for individuals and for our race as a whole.

My good friend and comrade Povl Riis-Knudsen, the Danish National Socialist, has devised a one-sentence definition of National Socialism that serves very well: National Socialism is the application of the laws of Nature to human affairs.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER? What separates it from other pro-White organizations?

MK: The NEW ORDER is a vanguard National Socialist organization. Our doctrine is derived directly from Mein Kampf and other Hitlerian sources.

Here is what we are not:

• We are not White Nationalists;
• We are not White separatists;
• We are not Alt-Right;
• We are not Balk Right;
• We are not Christian Identists;
• We are not Satanists;
• We are not Identitarians;
• We are not National Bolsheviks or Strasserites

Our goal is to promote strict, hardline Hitlerian National Socialism, and not something else. We try to stay on good footing with other pro-White groups that are not National Socialist, and we wish them no ill will. Anything that moves White people in the general direction of National Socialism is worthwhile, in our opinion. But ultimately there is only one movement qualified to lead White people into the future, and that movement is National Socialism, embodied in North America as the NEW ORDER.

The NEW ORDER traces its organizational descent directly to George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, later renamed the National Socialist White People’s Party. When Commander Rockwell was assassinated in 1967, party leadership devolved to Matt Koehl.

As I mentioned earlier, Commander Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. So our organizational history goes back some six decades.

Also, from our earliest days, commanders Rockwell and Koehl had contact with the remnants of the original Hitler movement in Germany, through comrades such as Arthur Axmann, Otto Remer, Gudrun Burwitz-Himmler, Bruno Ludtke, Hans-Ulrich Rudel, Winifred Wagner, Hans Baur, Florentine Rost van Tonnigen, Hanna Reitsch, Hans Severus Ziegler and others.

No other pro-White or National Socialist group has and organizational pedigree that even comes close to ours.

I mentioned earlier that we a “vanguard organization.” Our predecessor, the National Socialist White People’s Party, was designed as a mass-oriented political formation. The NEW ORDER, in contrast, does not seek to recruit the masses of people into its ranks, or much less to solicit their support in elections.

Rather, we are looking for a small number of highly motivated, exceptional people – an elite – who are fully committed to the National Socialist cause.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER’s stand on religion?

MK: The NEW ORDER is incorporated in Virginia as a non-profit religious organization. Our leadership views National Socialism as our religion. For us, the tenets of the National Socialist worldview fulfill all of the spiritual requirements for a new religious faith. Sometimes people refer to this as the Hitler Faith or Esoteric Hitlerism.

Our critics sometimes claim that we worship Adolf Hitler as a “god,” but this is a misunderstanding or deliberate distortion of our belief.

Our founder, Matt Koehl, put our perception of Adolf Hitler as follows:

There is but one Supreme Being, one Ultimate Source of all causation — one great Primal Power, infinite and eternal — which we recognize. We are all creations of this Power. Once in thousands of years, however, a singular and unique figure appears, whose special mission it is to declare anew the Divine Will and to redefine human history. In so doing, he himself becomes a universal symbol. In recent time, this extraordinary, providential figure appeared in the person of — Adolf Hitler.With his miraculous appearance, a new age on Earth has begun. That is why we honor and revere him. (Source: FAQ)

Thus our attitude towards Adolf Hitler is not one of “worship,” as the term is commonly understood, but rather one of veneration.

So, this is our belief. But we do not attempt to force our religious insights on our followers. How somebody views the Divine is up to them, it’s a matter of personal conscience. Everyone has to find their own path to God.

We have as supporters people who are Christians, or Odinists, or atheists. We even have a few Buddhists. Savitri Devi famously embraced Hinduism. As long as someone is an Aryan and they support National Socialism, they are welcome in our ranks, regardless of religious conviction. Religious intolerance and persecution are un-Aryan.

RM: Does the NEW ORDER have a plan? What is its strategy?

MK: For obvious reasons, we are not going to reveal our strategy to the public in any detail, but I can speak about it in general terms.

Broadly speaking, there are two different strategic approaches that hardline pro-Whites have utilized over the years: the mass-approach and the vanguard strategy.

The mass-approach consists on enlisting as many people as possible into the movement as quickly as possible. It is characterized by public demonstrations, publicity seeking, a high media profile and public name recognition. Little or no attention is paid to building a solid infrastructure, nor in ideological development, nor in quality control concerning those recruited.

The mass-approach results in a lot of publicity and attention, and in a relatively larger membership. But the organizations that adopt this approach normally do not last long. They are filled with infiltrators and other troublemakers. The publicity that they receive is almost always negative. Their average existence is about two years, after which they disband or fade away, only to be replaced by similar dead-end organizations. This is not the approach that the NEW ORDER is taking.

Instead, we are pursuing a vanguard strategy. This is characterized by slow growth and consolidation, by intensive theoretical development, and by careful attention as to whom we recruit. We have small numbers, a low public profile, and little engagement with the media. We spend most of our effort and resources is building a solid infrastructure. Our public activities are limited. Their goal is to spread our message as far and wide as possible among the broad masses of our racial sisters and brothers.

We have encountered groups which claim that they pursue both strategies simultaneously, that is, a mass strategy accompanied by intenstive infrastructutal development. But realistically, given the limited resources that pro-Whites have at their disposal, you cannot do both at once; you have to choose one to focus on.

Our mid-range goal is to create a nationwide network of local National Socialist communities, which we term folk strongholds. We will have more to say about this in the future. However, as I said before, we do not intend to broadcast our plans to the public. We prefer to boast about our accomplishments after they have been made – not beforehand.

RM: How can people help out if they support the NEW ORDER and its beliefs? Where can people go if they want more information on the NEW ORDER?

MK: The basic level of affiliation to the NEW ORDER is that of Registered Supporter. An RS is someone who states that they are in agreements with our beliefs and who agrees to pay a monthly financial pledge to help support our operations. They have to fill out a registration form which includes a postal address. The NEW ORDER is an organization that is based in the real world. We have no Registered Supporters who are anonymous, or who are only known to us online.

If someone still wants to support our work, but they do not want to make the formal commitment of becoming a Registered Supporter, one thing that they can do is to subscribe to out print publication, the NS BULLETIN. It has been published continuously since 1967.

Further information on our Registered Supporter program and on subscribing to the NS BULLETIN can be found at the “About and Contact” page on our blog. (About and Contact)

Some people want to support us by making a financial contribution. We are now in the middle of our Fall Building Campaign, the goal of which is to raise $5,000 above our normal income. Donations of any size may be made to our post office box address in the form of check, money order or well-concealed cash. Money orders are a good option for those who want to donate anonymously, but do not trust sending cash through the mail.

To hear the original broadcast of this interview, go to: https:///

Select “Sun 04 Nov 2018”

Published in: on November 14, 2018 at 9:30 am  Leave a Comment  

The Dangers of Ed-jew-cation


By Quintus Sertorius

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Charles Yancey, 1816.

A people ignorant of their own heritage are doomed to be a servile people. Shorn of a deeper connection to their past, an ignorant people will likewise lose any responsibility for the future and will quickly devolve into pathetic sub-humanism, actuated only by base animalistic urges, lurid escapist fantasy, and instant gratification. Such a people are incapable of great achievements, and quickly become incompetent even with respect to their own self-interest. Ultimately, the continued existence of an ignorant people will be subservient to the whims of those who hold proudly to their history, the accomplishments of their forebears, and their culture. It is for these reasons that the jews have so thoroughly infested the academic institutions of White nations.

Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, 1789.

The jews have subverted the process of learning throughout White societies, and they perniciously attempt to make it as difficult as possible for individuals to learn by banning the distribution of books, attempting to censor the internet, and foreclosing conversation or debate on topics that do not meet with Hebraic approval. The depredations of the jews have turned our schools into ill-conceived multi-racial anthropology experiments that resemble something between a circus and a prison. Two generations ago, Revilo P. Oliver decried the fact that our schools no longer provided an education, but instead merely provided training – sadly our jew-controlled schools have reached yet another low. They disguise propaganda as knowledge, and inculcate a deleterious egotism in the student-victims, so that they react with moronic anger or arrogant disdain when confronted with the fact that there could be knowledge beyond their ken. The broad base of practical and theoretical knowledge that once nurtured the capacity for creativity unique to the White race is conspicuously absent from today’s thoroughly jew-infested educational institutions. Modern curriculums are surreptitiously designed and executed by jews to stifle the intellectual curiosity, the spirit of exploration, and the drive for self-improvement – all traits found in greater degrees among the White race, and sometimes called the “Faustian spirit” that propels us to the forefront of innovation and true human progress. Instead of developing the discipline and skills to support autodidacticism, the current kosher curriculums demand hyper-specialization which paradoxically encourages a narcissism of intellect, while at the same time instilling a mentality of helplessness in the immeasurably large areas of life outside the narrow field of hyper-specialization. This process produces automatons well suited to work that is, in reality, menial and unthinking but hidden behind byzantine complexity; a complexity that exists in large part to disguise the fact that the work is meaningless drudgery.

Our plague of jewish-trained over-specialized “experts” believe themselves to be at the pinnacle of human brilliance because they can stolidly recite sections of a corporate human resources policy, or follow the instructions for using a JavaScript library. Meanwhile, the very existence of real knowledge and true learning becomes forgotten. In their absence, formerly prosperous White societies coarsen and decay as hedonism and degeneracy supplant the rigor and self-respect needed for creativity to blossom. True enlightenment becomes unattainable – as has long been the plan of our implacable racial enemies, the jews.

We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated.” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol. No. 9.

What, precisely, can one expect to find in the brainwashing centers formerly known as schools? One need not look far for examples that make plain the insidious jewish role in subverting our educational institutions.  Recently, the University of San Francisco began offering a class called “Black-Jewish Relations.” Taught by a low-functioning jewess and a living fossil whose credentials include four years in prison for seven drug and weapons convictions, student-victims can shackle themselves with debt in order to hear Yiddish poems about “Whiteness,” and share their “personal recollections of prejudice and discrimination.” Needless to say, in the California failed-state the classroom is packed with a sullen mob of opportunistic Asian termites and Mestizo scavengers, and even an Israeli zookeeper likely wondering when this pack of feral non-Whites will be sufficiently trained to release into unsuspecting, apathetic White communities.

We will establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress. We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory. In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it to a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political…” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 5.

The institutions that once formed the foundation of our White societies, and once existed for the benefit and advancement of White nations, have been corrupted by kosher connivance into the very tools being used to eradicate us from our homelands. Nowhere is this more evident than in our schools. The most vulnerable members of the White race, our children, are offered up as free-range victims for the violence of the dangerous, civilizationally incompatible sub-human sewage that floods our schools in the name of “diversity.” Education has degenerated into a system of indoctrination promoting jewish aggrandizement and White hatred. It consumes the most impressionable, idealistically-driven, and energetic years of our youth; it cannot be foolishly entrusted to the rabidly anti-White jews, no matter how disingenuously they pretend to be educational “experts.” The only fields of jewish expertise are usury, lying, and White genocide. It is our responsibility to protect the future of our race from these toxic, Judaic influences. We must constantly prepare ourselves so that we are able to counteract the jewish malignancies that have turned education into a weapon that destroys White minds and enervates White souls. We must not allow our children to be saturated in the jewish promotion of degeneracy, deviancy, and miscegenation for twelve years in what are ostensibly called schools. We must stop the jewish-orchestrated White genocide.

Published at

Published in: on November 12, 2018 at 8:12 pm  Leave a Comment  

A New Folk


By Commander Matt Koehl 

FOR YEARS we have talked about saving the white race and defined that as the main purpose for which we were fighting. But the matter requires closer examination.

Let me pose this question: Is the white race worth saving? If so, why?

Lincoln Rockwell worked, fought and died thinking that he could rally his fellow white men for a better world. His reward? Mockery, indifference, rejection and persecution by the very ones he was trying to save.

Today, the situation hasn’t gotten any better. If anything, it has gotten worse. Most white people simply do not care. Not only do they not care, but they are prepared to accept any outrage and indignity, as long as their personal creature comforts and pleasures are not disturbed.

You all know what I am talking about. More often than not, our own people prove to be our own worst enemy. As a result, it is all likely to lead one to discouragement and despair.

So again, I ask the question: Is the white race worth saving? Is it really worth fighting for?


“But,” you say, “did Adolf Hitler give up on his people after World War I, when things also looked bleak and the public he was trying to reach seemed caught up in left- and right-wing madness?”

Aha. No, he did not. But there are three important distinctions here:

First, despite the general decadence of the Weimar period, the German people as a whole were not nearly as decadent as American whites today. Even most rank-and-file Social Democrats and Communists were basically sound, despite their mistaken ideology.

Second there was a ferment for radical change, in which the populace was interested in a bit more than fun and games and personal consumption.

Third, the German people were not only of one basic racial stock, but they comprised a Volk.

None of these factors apply to the North American situation today. Not only are we dealing with a far more decadent population, and not only is there no ferment for real change, but above all, there is no true folk on this continent.

For the most part, the white race in North America is a heterogeneous agglomeration of individuals, with no common sense of ethnic identity — unlike all the various racial minorities in our midst. Whites have forgotten their European roots and heritage. They have become “Americans” — which can encompass just about any featherless biped on the planet capable of landing on these shores.

That is our dilemma. That’s the objective reality we must confront. We have no ethnos, no folk. White people in North America have no recognized ethnic center to which they can appeal.


So, once again: Is the white race worth saving?

And here, the first question we must ask is: What do we mean by “white race”?

If we are referring to a majority of the present so-called white race, then our answer to the original question must be a most definite and emphatic “no.” Because decadent peoples and races have no claim to survival.

Here we can forget about the mass of brain-dead and those committed to death, rather than to life. We must, for example, be prepared to write off race-mixers, the degenerate purveyors of sodomy, those who adopt non-whites, self-hating types out on a guilt trip, and all the nominally white freaks and zombies and those of deficit character one finds on trash TV — as well as all those whites who have given up and refuse to fight in the face of the greatest threat to our race.

The sad fact is that the so-called white race is suffering from hundreds of years of dysgenic breeding. Fortunately, many — if not most — of its defective and worthless numbers will perish, as the Old Order goes down to final collapse.

And that is Nature’s way: Weak whites must be weeded out, so that the healthy and strong may survive to propagate. We certainly do not want to see everything white survive. Because that would mean that we would have to include race-mixers, like O.J.’s late Nicole Simpson, those weird, whigger speciments we find on trash TV, and all the rest. This is not what we are fighting for.

If, on the other hand, in speaking of the race we are referring not to everything that calls itself white, but rather to that small, relatively uncontaminated segment which bears the potential for higher evolutionary development, then our answer to the question of salvageable worth must be a resounding “YES!”


The problem is this: Races do not live — and cannot be saved — in toto as abstract, taxonomical entities, but only as distinct peoples, folks — Völker. And National Socialism — and hence, a requisite National Socialist solution — can only be applied within the context of such a folk, i.e., of a genetically related population with shared values, ideals, hopes, dreams and aspirations, as well as a sense of common identity.

But what we do when no such folk exists — as is the case here in America today?

The answer is quite obvious and very simple: If the white race is to survive on this continent, a new folk must be formed.

But a folk — ein Volk — does not just pop up instantaneously at the snap of the fingers, like some popular pain remedy. It requires generations of common living experience for even a modest start.

Yet, that is the very process — one of folk-formation — which we must consciously pursue, if Aryankind is to have any future on this continent and in the world.


So, how do we get started? Here we must first understand what our task is not.

•  It is not one of appealing to masses of the brain-dead.

•  It is not one of running candidates for public office.

•  It is not one of concerning ourselves with ephemeral political issues, issues which are transient and about which we cannot do anything anyway. Remember that we are not going to solve problems of the world, until we have first gotten our own house in order.

•  Our task is not one of playing “revolution” or trying to revive the Third Reich.

•  It is not one of trying to save everything white, such as the Nicole Simpsons of the world, guilt-ridden self-haters, or the types who appear regularly in public confessions on trash TV.

Saving the race does not require preserving everything white. Rather, it involves salvaging and mobilizing that small number which comprises the best elements of our race. This is the raw material which will form the basis for a new folk — not the indifferent, self-centered, brainless flotsam of a decadent, materialistic, consumer society.


There are three basic types of people in contemporary society. Our Leader has described these as the very best, the very worst, and those in between the two. What we are talking about here are not artificial class or social divisions, but ethica lgradations within the populace.

The best may be described as idealists, those willing to subordinate their own personal interests to the greater good of the whole. The worst are the opposite: those who always place their own selfish interests above everything else. While one category embodies social virtue, the other reflects social vice.

Both of these categories, however, comprise but a small fraction of the total population. Standing between the two is the broad mass of people, who exhibit a mixture of virtue and vice. When the best element is dominant in society — as was the case in National Socialist Germany — the better, more idealistic qualities of the average person also predominate. On the other hand, when the worst elements are dominant — as is the case today — the reverse is true: the worst, meanest, most selfish and materialistic side of ordinary men and women becomes the social norm.

In laying the foundation for a new folk, therefore, what we must seek is that minority of racial idealists scattered about in the general population, to the exclusion of the other two categories.

What we are talking about is not a majority, but a minority of will and determination, one which will one day succeed, where a decadent white majority has repeatedly failed.


Right now, there are at least 160,000 racial brothers and sisters scattered about in North America, who think and feel exactly as we do. It is our job to identify them, reach them, and bring them into our ranks.

And beyond these 160,000, there are at least another 1,600,000 who share our fundamental ideals and values, but who have not yet achieved ideological clarity and understanding, whom we must educate.

Finally, there are at least 16,000,000 of good Aryan racial stock among the broad mass of the population, who are confused and perhaps even superficially hostile, but who must nevertheless be won over for a better world.

These are the fractional numbers we are working with. But never mind. These are the ones for whom we are fighting, the ones who represent the future of our race!

Are you beginning to see, now, what is meant when we refer to a “new folk” in our introductory leaflet “What Is the NEW ORDER?”


There are four stages, or phases, in the process of folk-formation, which we describe as: (I) IDEA; (II) MOVEMENT; (III) COMMUNITY; and (IV) FOLK.

The First Phase is one of advancing and propagating the Idea, articulated as a revolutionary new faith, to provide a spiritual foundation and infrastructure for the mobilization of those racial idealists we seek.

In advancing the Idea, we set the proper tone for racial discourse, by showing the relevance and significance of the Hitlerian message. In so doing, we establish a practical working field of common aspiration, will and consciousness. All of this, of course, is based on the premise that before there can be effective action, there must first be a common outlook, a common vision and common values as the basis for a common will.

The Second Phase is that of building the Movement. To the extent that the First Phase has accomplished the necessary preliminary work, this phase runs concurrently with it.

And here, we just understand a few basics:

(1)  All talk of gaining political power is a nonstarter, without consideration of the necessary preliminaries.

(2)  As the Old Order collapses, the political structure will be the last facet of this decaying order to collapse.

(3)  Before there can be a new state, there must first be a movement constitutiong the embryonic nucleus of the coming order.

(4)  The struggle for a New Order will involve protracted struggle.

The Third Phase involves the organic development of a National Socialist community out of the Movement struggle for a New Order. In the disintegrating circumstances and uncertainties of the future, the Movement must evolve into a social unit capable of acting autonomously and independently of the System and eventually meeting all the vital needs of our people.

The Fourth and final Phase is the culmination of the process, with the emergence of a biological unit — a proto-Folk. Such a folk can be considered to have come into existence when, out of a National Socialist community, a third or fourth successive generation of National Socialists has been born and reared as part of a self-perpetuating ethnic body.

Only with the creation of such an ethnic identity will there be the necessary organic basis, not only for racial survival but also for successful definitive action leading to the establishment of the coming New Order.

In summary, then, the correct path to the New Order proceeds from the Idea to the Movement, then to a Community and on to a new Folk — in that order.


Some have suggested trying to shortcut the process by creating a white racial community, without first embracing the Idea or the Movement. They have advanced the idea of reaching the Promised Land by having large white families and simply breeding themselves into power! Apart from practical, economic realities involved in implementing such a scheme, things cannot possibly work out in that way. Consider this:

(a)  Every offspring produced would not automatically become a National Socialist and, indeed, could well turn out hostile to the very concept of a better world. Even if one were to have a dozen children, it would count for nothing, unless those produced became committed contributors to this Cause. Barring that proviso, and aside from any separate biological considerations, the selective process necessary for folk-formation would be thwarted.

(b)  Turning inward at this early stage and neglecting those tens and hundreds of thousands — yes, millions — of Aryans outside our ranks today would detract from the vital work of recruiting this idealist element from out of the general population. If the idea of mere biological breeding were to become the focus of our efforts, it would smother the Idea and kill the Movement in its attempt to leapfrog past these vital prerequisites, which hold the key to our future progress and development.

Eventually, of course, a National Socialist community and folk will want to adopt a policy of large families to replenish our ranks and overcome any numerical deficiency. Then we can regularly expect to see families with eight to 12 children. But that time has not yet arrived.

Without recognizing the inherent decadence of the majority of contemporary whites, and without a proper spiritual idea and faith and accompanying set of values upon which to base such an effort, any such breeding program is doomed to failure.

Similarly, any mere survivalist enterprise or gated community without an articulated spiritual core — in this case a Hitlerian religious faith — is untenable in the long run and is no substitute for the formation of a true folk.


I have already mentioned the three types of people in our society. Actually, we can now simplify things by describing just two types of white people: (a) those of destiny; and (b) those slated for extinction.

And here, we are not speaking of people who happen to be white, but of a folk that is Aryan — meaning “noble,” in the truest sense of the word — as well as of those who have the potential to become part of this folk.

Creation is not just something that occurred but once in the past; it is an ongoing, evolutionary process that has never stopped.

Nietzsche once spoke of a new folk as a precondition for the Übermensch — the superman, superior man, Homo superbus. What this folk involves is selection of the best. For higher evolution to occur, it is absolutely requisite that there be this process of selection and separation.

Our National Socialist watchword is: “Ein Volk / Ein Reich / Ein Führer.”

In the person of Adolf Hitler — the Leader and Guide sent to us by Providence — we have our Führer. In the coming New Order, we see the Thousand-Year Reich promised by our Leader.

Finally, in a new folk embracing the highest ideals of the Führer, we recognize that renewed, regenerate body of our race, yet to be constituted for the fulfillment of His will here on Earth: His Volk.

Providence has already begun the process of creating this new folk — the true Volk of Adolf Hitler — and we are part of this dynamic process. And it is this folk, in turn, which will one day be capable of undertaking all those measures necessary for the accomplishment of His New Order and the fulfillment of our high destiny as Aryans.

Published in: on November 9, 2018 at 10:10 am  Leave a Comment  

Other Losses

WW2 death camp Rhine Meadow

German POWs Mass Murdered in Blatant War Crime and Violation of the Geneva Convention
In the final days of the Second World War, as the Allies advanced deep into Germany and the German Army was on the verge of defeat, the U.S. Army captured approximately 3 million German prisoners of war.
Under the direction of jewish General Dwight Eisenhower, most of these German POWs were taken to open fields in the area of the Rhine River valley in Western Germany and given no access to food, water, or shelter — and simply left to die.   This was a blatant war crime and violation of international treaty requiring humane treatment of prisoners of war, and release of POWs after the cease of hostilities.  The American military attempted to justify this war crime by simply relabeling the German POWs as “disarmed enemy forces”, therefore alleging that the prisoners were still “hostile enemy forces”.These were the real death camps of World War Two, not the slave labor and internment camps run by the Germans in the alleged jewish “holocaust”, which is a jewish fraud and lie

Over one million German POWs were deliberately murdered in the captivity of the American-run camps.

Published in: on November 9, 2018 at 9:06 am  Leave a Comment  

The film The Israel lobby Didn’t Want You To See

The Electronic Intifada has obtained a complete copy of The Lobby – USA, a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s covert influence campaign in the United States.

They are releasing the leaked film simultaneously with France’s Orient XXI and Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar, which have respectively subtitled the episodes in French and Arabic.

The film was made by Al Jazeera during 2016 and was completed in October 2017.

But it was censored after Qatar, the gas-rich Gulf emirate that funds Al Jazeera, came under intense Israel lobby pressure not to air the film.

Although Al Jazeera’s director-general claimed last month that there were outstanding legal issues with the film, his assertions have been flatly contradicted by his own journalists.

You can watch episodes three and four here.

Published in: on November 7, 2018 at 9:12 am  Leave a Comment  

Happy Birthday Ezra Pound


         Ezra Weston Loomis Pound born 30 October 1885

To celebrate this great man I share with you his RADIO SPEECHES OF WORLD WAR II


Click on above image for link


Published in: on October 30, 2018 at 7:48 am  Leave a Comment  

Monica Schaefer Free With Time Served

By Carolyn Yeager

BOTH MONICA AND HER BROTHER ALFRED RECEIVED PRISON SENTENCES on Oct. 26 at their trial in Munich, Germany, for “denying the Holocaust.”

Monica, 59, (above) was given a sentence of 10 months and was set free immediately as she has been incarcerated for that long already. Alfred, 63, was sentenced to 3 years, 2 months – obviously seen as the more ‘dangerous’ of the two.

According to the Canadian Jewish News, the only media coverage I have found so far other than a brief email from Lady Michele Renouf who was personally contacted by one of their attorneys:

The siblings were tried together on six counts of “incitement to hatred” for producing and posting at least one video in which Monika Schaefer denied the Holocaust.

In the five-minute video uploaded to Youtube, titled ‘Sorry, Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust,’ Monica Schaefer said the Holocaust was the “biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history.” Whoops, guess she didn’t know that was hateful; she was trying to do good to Germans like herself and her mother. But in our post-WWII system only Jews are allowed to defend themselves.

In the video, Monica also claimed that death camps were really work camps where prisoners were kept “as healthy and as well-fed as was possible.” This is also hateful to the ears of Jews; they can’t stand to hear that they were ever treated well or justly by White Europeans. It’s pure agony for them.

The court found that the producer of this video was brother Alfred, who carried out this crime in the town of Tutzing, outside Munich. That puts it under Germany’s jurisdiction. On top of that, Monica admitted that she knew he intended to publish it online. So guilty they are, and as we know, any evidence that supports that what they say about the “Holocaust” is true is not allowed in German courtrooms. It was determined long ago (at the Nuremberg Tribunals in 1946) that Truth Is No Defense when it comes to the findings of those tribunals. Their findings are law and can no longer be questioned.

Alfred Schaefer will probably appeal his sentence … not that it will do any good. He is considered a ‘troublemaker’ (another who wishes to defend National Socialist Germany) who they want to keep out of circulation as much as possible. But we congratulate Monica on finally being freed. We’ll keep you informed as we know more.

Published in: on October 28, 2018 at 1:32 am  Comments (1)  

Postcards From The Third Reich

Published in: on October 27, 2018 at 3:21 am  Leave a Comment  

German Legion des Voluntaires


The Legion of French Volunteers Against Bolshevism was a militia of Vichy France founded on 8 July 1941. It volunteered to fight against the Soviet Union on the Eastern Front. It was officially known by its German designation, the 638th Infantry Regiment (Infanterieregiment 638).

By October 1941, there were two battalions of 2,271 men which had 181 officers and an additional staff of 35 German officers. They fought the Soviet Union Red Army as part of the foreign contingent of the German Army. They were sent into combat near Moscow in November 1941 as part of the 7th Infantry Division. The LVF lost half their numbers in action or through frostbite. In 1942 the men were assigned to anti-partisan duties in the Byelorussian SSR (Belarus). At the same time, another unit was formed in France, La Légion Tricolore (Tricolor Regiment) but this unit was absorbed into the LVF six months later.


During the spring of 1942, the LVF was reorganized with only the 1st and 3rd battalions. The LVF’s French commander, Colonel Roger Labonne, was relieved in mid-1942, and the unit was attached to various German divisions until June 1943 when Colonel Edgar Puaud took command. The two independent battalions were again united in a single regiment and continued fighting partisans in Ukraine. In early 1944, the unit again took part in anti-partisan duties. In June 1944, the LVF was called into action when Army Group Centre‘s front collapsed under the Red Army‘s summer offensive. The LVF was attached to the 4th SS Police Regiment and fought in a delaying action.


A new recruiting drive in Vichy France attracted 3,000 applicants, mostly members of the militia and university students. The new formation was known as the 8th SS Volunteer Sturmbrigade France. On 1 September 1944, the Legion of French Volunteers was officially disbanded. A new unit, the Waffen-Grenadier-Brigade der SS “Charlemagne”, was formed out of the remnants of the LVF and French Sturmbrigade, which was also disbanded. In February 1945, the Waffen-Grenadier-Brigade was officially upgraded to a division and became the 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS Charlemagne (1st French). At that time it had a strength of 7,340 men.



Published in: on October 26, 2018 at 7:43 am  Leave a Comment  

The State Labour Service In Germany


It is not easy to give the foreigner a true picture of the State Labour Service, because this is a National Socialist scheme based upon conditions such as exist in Germany only. If English readers are to form a proper judgment of it, they must first of all know something of the premises upon which its development depended.


Leader of the Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Department attached to the Reich Labour Leader

The State Labour Service has to fulfil two great tasks, entrusted to it by the Labour Service Law, namely, an economic and an educational one.

Let us deal first of all with its economic aspect. Even before 1914 Germany was an over-populated country. By the Versailles Treaty, she lost 9.5 per cent. of her population and 13 per cent. of her area – a loss which made the pressure of over-population still greater. Moreover, the districts thus separated contained the richest agricultural land of the Reich. In this way was lost 18 per cent. of the area under potatoes and 17 per cent. of that under rye, the percentages for other products being similar. When it is remembered that Germany’s defeat in the War was ultimately due to famine, it is not difficult to realize how terrible it was for her to have to yield up twice as much of her crop bearing area as corresponds to the loss of population. Germany thus lost her chance of being self-supporting in the way of food, and as long as a people depends upon others for essential commodities, it cannot be said to be truly free. Independence in this domain is of vital importance to the freedom of every State.

It was, therefore, quite natural that Herr Hitler, the Führer and Chancellor, should desire to provide himself, as soon as he had taken up office, with an instrument that would help him to make Germany self-supporting once more. The instrument chosen for that purpose was the Reich Labour Service.

Colonel (now Reich Labour Leader) Hierl, to whom supreme command of the Labour Service was given, did not start upon his duties without sound preparation. In 1929 he had already laid before the Führer his plans for the development of a Labour Service and had received Herr Hitler’s approval. From that time onwards, he carefully worked out all the details and took all the steps required to establish a National Socialist Labour Service. Although membership was to be voluntary at first, it was to become a national duty for all Germans later on.

The outcome of that preparatory work was that the Reich Labour Leader, who had surrounded himself with a staff of efficient co-operators, arrived at the following conclusions, namely:

We have in Germany large areas of waste or insufficiently cultivated land that could be used for growing crops. Some 2,000,000 acres could be converted into arable land and more than 2,500,000 acres of poor soil could be made to yield far better crops than is the case now if subjected to improvement. In addition to this, there are another 1,000,000 acres, including waste forests, that could also be made profitable. All in all, this amounts to some 5,000,000 acres – an area as large as the Prussian province of Westphalia or Schleswig-Holstein. It is, therefore, no exaggeration on the part of Colonel Hierl when he continually emphasises that the State Labour Service is capable of adding a whole province to the present area of the Reich.

It is actually true that the Labour Service, when it has carried through the programme at present laid down for it, will have provided Germany, within half the span of a man’s life, with sufficient agricultural land to ensure an adequate food supply for the whole country. German food independence will then have been won.

The results hitherto achieved by the Labour Service in making the countryside fruitful show that these statements are no illusions. An area the size of the Saar district was cleared and made ready for cultivation between 1933 and 1935.

So much for the economic point of view; we will now briefly examine the educational aspect of the Labour Service.

In this connection it is necessary to remember that all civilized countries, since the coming of the Machine Age, have greatly suffered from the erection of certain social barriers. Briefly, populations have been divided into two great classes, bourgeoisie and proletariat. The bourgeoisie adopted, for the most part, a Liberal Capitalism which amounted practically to a recognition of the principle that “those who have may do as they please,” to which the proletariat replied by asserting that “possession is theft.” It must be clear to all unprejudiced persons that both these ideas will finally lead to anarchy and Bolshevism. However, the development of all civilised countries has shown that this recognition is lacking, although the troubles from which all have suffered – some more and some less – are largely attributable to these class differences.

Germany, because of her historical development and, above all, because of her rapid transition from an agricultural to an industrial country, suffered from class quarrels in their extremist form, the position being aggravated by her loss of the War and the resultant Weimar system of government. When the Führer attained power, he was faced with the fact that the German people were divided into two sections neither of whom – though using the German language – could understand the other. Indeed, they were even prepared to fight one another to the death. The Führer and his movement succeeded in achieving the impossible by putting an end to class hatred.

Herr Hitler then instructed the Labour Service to be an instrument by which the lack of vision of the bourgeoisie and the class hatred of the proletariat should be counteracted, and a true community of all Germans should be created. On the National Labour Day, May 1st, 1934, when speaking on the Tempelhof Field, he declared:

It is not a mere chance that the party representing class war and class division fought so bitterly against compulsory Labour Service. They lived by the destruction of the nation and it would not have served their purpose to see these divisions set aside. They therefore told the masses that the Labour Service was designed only to steal the labour from the labourer. They had no Labour Service: instead, they had six million unemployed. We have introduced Labour Service and we have reduced the number of unemployed by more than half. We do not want the Labour Service to take the worker away from his place. In view of the number of employed people and the number enrolled in the Labour Service, such an assertion would be ridiculous. But we do want the Labour Service to compel every young German to work with his hands at least once and thus to contribute to the progressive development of his people. Above all, we want those Germans who are in sedentary occupations to learn what manual work means, so that they may find understanding and sympathy for those of their comrades whose lives are spent in the fields, the factory or the workshop. We want to destroy the haughtiness with which, unfortunately, so many intellectuals look down upon the manual workers and we wish them to realise that they, too, will be worth all the more if they possess a certain capacity for physical work. The whole idea underlying the Labour Service is to promote understanding between all classes and thus to strengthen the spirit of national solidarity. We desire that all should learn to know each other so that, little by little, the natural basis may be formed of a true inward fellowship, a fellowship which was destroyed in the course of many centuries. National Socialism is inspired with the irrevocable determination to re-establish it. We all know, however, that this cannot be achieved by mere words or professions, but only by a new kind of education.

This may be said to be a rough description of the principles in accordance with which Colonel Hierl has led the Reich Labour Service.

We will now briefly describe how the educational task of the Service is approached. It comprises physical culture as well as intellectual instruction, the latter having a deliberately National Socialist tendency.

Physical education is designed to improve the entire physique of the worker, and especially to give him suppleness of limb. The successes attained in this direction are already considerable. Last summer I conducted two delegations of officers of high rank, sent to Germany by two important Powers, round some of our camps and showed them what our Service was doing in the way of physical culture. What they saw aroused their astonishment and admiration, although both delegations came from countries which pay great attention to the physical well-being of their populations. “This is undoubtedly a peak achievement,” was the comment of a General Staff officer who is an expert, not only in his own country, but who is intimately acquainted with these matters in three other European countries. I can assure everyone that the Reich Labour Service is firmly determined to maintain that superiority, because it is of enormous importance to the health of our people that our young manhood should undergo this physical education.

Then there is the intellectual education, which is National Socialism’s appeal to hearts and heads alike. This teaching is not given in class-rooms, but rather consists in the actual conduct of life and work in the camp. Experience is the thing that chiefly matters, whilst the instruction in political science is only an accessory. Even this knowledge is not imparted by the methods of the class-room or the barracks, but rather in the form of a kind of labour comradeship, by means of which the Labour Service Leader puts all matters in so simple and comprehensible a way that they are bound to make an impression. The young workers’ heads are not stuffed with knowledge (which they would, in any case, rapidly forget afterwards), but they are made to understand more intuitively what our Leader desires and what is the meaning of the National Socialist battle for the people and the State.

The young people live together in their camps, far from the big cities, and break German ground with their spades, so that members of all classes – workers, officers, farmers and salesmen – get to know one another and to respect one another’s feelings. In our camps, class distinctions are overcome by the facts of experience. Elsewhere, leading articles are written deriding class struggles, but we abolish them with the aid of the spade and thanks to the community spirit naturally growing up in the Labour Camps. Here the son of middle-class parents learns that the labourer’s son is worth just as much as he, whilst the labourer learns to value the student as a true comrade. The most valuable lesson, however, thus learnt by them is that all work, whether done by the hand or the brain, is equally honourable if performed by decent people for decent purposes. Labour Service has, therefore, provided a new set of practical ethics which is above both the bourgeois and proletarian way of thought, and supersedes both of them. In our camps, the conception “bourgeoisie” meets with just as much ridicule as the conception” proletariat,” for every member looks upon himself as a German, and nothing else. There can be no doubt that the work now done under the inspiring leadership of Colonel Hierl is of so great an importance to future generations that it can hardly be realised by us, and this is certainly recognised – even if not fully – by the many people who visit us from abroad. We appreciate their admiration, but we must remind them that our Labour Service is not something that can simply be reproduced elsewhere. This, therefore, is what we always point out to foreign commissions wishing to study the Labour Service:

The worst mistake you could make would be the attempt to copy what we have done. Our Labour Service is essentially German, and is based exclusively upon our home needs and our own sense of values. In these matters, each nation must follow the paths laid down by its own needs and its peculiar instincts, because the conditions and circumstances that have to be dealt with are different in each case. From us you can learn only one thing, and that is that the social disintegration from which nearly all countries are suffering cannot be overcome by writing leading articles or by speech-making, but only by means of action. This, and this only, can be learnt from the German Labour Service. Organisation and development must be evolved separately in each country.

In this the Reich Labour Service resembles National Socialism: it is not an international affair, but simply a German one. So German is it that, to the astonishment of the rest of the world, the young German girls will shortly be drawn into a compulsory Labour Service. They, of course, will not handle spades, but will perform woman’s work, for the women of Germany are also to learn that no higher lot can be theirs than to work for their nation in the home, at the cooking-stove and amongst their children.

Thus the Reich Labour Service teaches all young Germans to be of use to their country.

Published in: on October 24, 2018 at 7:35 am  Leave a Comment