Are you willing to be Plundered? Yes or No?!

…They only want to know one thing: Are you willing to be plundered? Yes or no? Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process? Yes or no? And when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good [*in their eyes]… ADOLF HITLER  [*Referring to the Versailles Dictate]

Yes, Germany was back then a democracy, before us (before The Third Reich), and we have been plundered and squeezed dry.
No . . . what does democracy or authoritarian state mean to those international hyenas? They don’t care at all. They are only interested in one thing: Are you willing to be plundered? Yes or no? Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process? Yes or no? And when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good. But when an authoritarian state declares, ‘You are not going to plunder our people . . .’ neither from the inside nor the outside’, then that is bad.

In reality, money rules in these countries (“democracies”).
They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner, and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor. This press shapes then public opinion. These political parties do not have any differences at all, like before with us (post WWI Germany). You already know the old political parties. They were all the same.

Then these people must think that especially in these countries (“democracies”) of freedom and wealth, there should exist a very comfortable life for its people. But the opposite is the case . . .
In these countries, in the so-called democracies, its people is by no means the main focus of attention. What really matters is EXCLUSIVELY THE Existence of this group of ‘democracy makers.’ That is, the existence of a few hundred giant capitalists who own all the factories and shares and who, ultimately, lead the people. They are not interested at all in the great mass of people. They are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements because they conduct their business everywhere. It is a small, rootless international clique that is turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace…

They can suppress us. They can kill us if you like, but we will not capitulate!

For the sake of the German Volk (people), Hail victory!
These Jews used to laugh about it-these idiots. They thought it was a joke. They are not laughing anymore. Today they realize the gravity of the situation – it’s become a bloody gravity.

It was a fight, especially against the people who seemed to have omnipotent power in our nation – the struggle against the Jews; a Satanic power had taken over our whole country that had been able to grip key positions of intellectual and spiritual life, but also of the political and economic life. And from these key positions they were able to control and monitor the whole nation. This power had, at the same time, the influence to persecute, even with the law, those who fought against this power, and those who were willing to oppose the advance of it.

Almighty Jewry thus declared war on us. And what have we achieved in these years until 1939! Their envy grew in the same way, in the same men who, back then, got Germany into World War One. Mr Churchill began immediately to agitate. Then Mr Eden, and then of course the Jews, with Mr Hore Belisha, and what all their names were, at the forefront. The smear campaign began, year after year . . . They said, ‘Yes, he (Adolf Hitler) is arming himself.’ Yes, I have always done that. They also asked me before, ‘Why do you have then the SA, if you want peace? Why did you (Adolf Hitler) create the SS, when, however, the only thing you want is fraternity?’ Because there are people who do not want it! And I wanted to show them, that I was prepared too for the other case.

The most precious possession you have in the world is your own people. And for this people, and for the sake of this people, we will struggle and fight. And never slacken. And never tire. And never lose courage. And never despair! ~ Adolf Hilter


20th-century German philosopher
Martin Heidegger:
The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, ‘live’ already for the longest time according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.

Richard Wagner:
[T]he Jew in truth is already more than emancipated. He rules, and will rule, so long as Money remains the power before which all our doings and our dealings lose their force. That the historical adversity of the Jews and the rapacious rawness of Christian-German potentates have brought this power within the hands of Israel’s sons needs no argument of ours to prove. . . . That this has also brought the public Art-taste of our time between the busy fingers of the Jew, however, is the matter whose ground we have to consider somewhat closer . . . .But emancipation from the yoke of Judaism appears to us the greatest of necessities; we must hold it weighty above all to prove our forces for this war of liberation.


Winifred Wagner in 1975:
I shall never disavow my friendship with [Hitler]; I cannot do it. . . . I am able, I mean, perhaps no one understands, but I am able completely to separate the Hitler I knew from what he is accused of these days. . . . The part of him I know, so to speak, I treasure as much today as before. If Hitler came in the door today, for example, I would be just as pleased and happy as ever to see him and to have him here.

Fredrick Toben in 2014:
It is the Wagnerian success at extricating himself from Jewish thought structures that Winifred Wagner clearly understood and valued in Adolf Hitler. It is the same thing which has led me to conclude that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest freedom fighters of the 20th century.


Wilhelm Marr in 1879:
The same goal, disintegration of the Germanic state for the benefit of Jewish interests, is pursued consistently everywhere.
The daily press is predominantly in Jewish hands, which have transformed journalism into an object of speculation and industrial production, into a business with public opinion; critique of theater, of art in general, is to three quarters in the hands of Jews. Writing about politics and even religion is in Jewish hands. Let us think about it for a moment.
Once emancipation had been won, instinct demanded that it be consolidated and reinforced. This could only be achieved by using the press and unionism. Consequently, Jewry flooded into both like high tide. It acted like it was extraordinarily intellectual and free of bias. It went as far as engaging in sarcastic irony of self; but while the highly gifted E. Dohm offered the most precious jokes about Israel in Kladdaradatsch, it turned
out that it was not advisable for a non-Jew to do the same.
Using the word Knoblauch [“garlic”] sufficed to accuse us Teutons of being religious haters………………
….Just try to comment upon Jewish rituals and statutes. You will find that not even the Pope is more infallible and unimpeachable. To comment upon their rituals is “hatred”, but if the Jew takes it upon himself to pronounce the last word in our religious and state affairs, then it is quite a different matter. – p.20 Footnote *) Not being of any religious denomination has helped me but little. When at the beginning of the sixties, upset about the consequences of Jewish emancipation, I fought in my “Judenspiegel” (Hamburg, Otto Meissner) passionately but impartially against the Judaizing of society, a gale against me arose, as though the band of Jericho had been reinforced by a thousand trumpets. An attempt was made to push me out of “Journalism” and even today I am unable to utter an independent thought on any question whatsoever in the Judaized press. I was put down as a common religious fanatic crying “Hepp-Hepp” even though every line in my “Judenspiegel” demonstrated the opposite. I had stirred up a hornet’s nest. But — let’s not speak of myself — where would Richard Wagner have been without the assistance of the King of Bavaria? Has there ever lived an artist who was more the object of attack by Jewry than Wagner? I am not referring to the musical experts who opposed him, but of the pack of scribblers and theater hounds, who did not forgive him for his views of Judaism, even if these might have been mistaken.
And from among the very same people in Israel, who had complained about the “lack of melody” in “Tannhäuser” and “Lohengrin”, a crowd rendered homage to him in Bayreuth — yes in Bayreuth –, to play even there the first violin, just as it is “the custom in Israel”, after Wagner had, in spite of it all forged his way.
— Even here there were two or three exceptions, Jews who had from the start shown friendly sentiments for the master’s work, but it is the exception which makes the rule. These are all historical-cultural facts, so unique in their aspects, so awesome, that it is impossible to dispute them using everyday polemics.
The proud Roman Empire has not been able to win such triumphs with all the might of its arms, as has typical Semitism won in the Occident and particularly in Germany. Among all the European states only Russia is left to still resist the frank foreign invasion. The most recent example of coming action against this last bulwark was set by Jewry in the case of Rumania. As current events and circumstances indicate the final surrender of Russia is only a question of time. In this multifaceted, huge state Jewry will find the cardinal point which it needs, to completely unhinge the Western world.

Published in: on August 4, 2016 at 9:52 am  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s