The Schaefer Trial

kuva1_monika-and-alfred-schaefer.jpg

It is true that the Schaefer siblings’ trial  commenced on the same day as the judgment in the big trial of the “National Socialist Underground” (NSU) “terror trial” – a long-running Process of seven years’ duration concerning the murder of nine immigrants (mainly Turks) and one policewoman – first believed to have been killed by ethnic-minority gangsters, now said to have been victims of a “neo-nazi” conspiracy which somehow escaped the attention of numerous state agents close to the alleged “terrorists”. (Incidentally, one of the defence lawyers involved in the NSU case, RA Wolfram Nahrath, is also the lawyer for Monika Schaefer.)

It is also true that actions of Alfred over the last few months have raised concerns among many National Socialist, as they have been very provocative, regularly threating Jews with lynch mobs, the kind of  rhetoric that plays right into the hands of our enemy and begs the question of whether or not we are watching yet an other clown show. I would say there is quite a bit to suggest we are but this dose not change the fact that it is a crime in Europe to question the Holocaust, and the trial of the Schaefer’s needs to be examined.

Perhaps there is  a certain attempt to conflate the idea of actual murder cases (NSU) with “thought-crime” cases in which there is no crime but only a Prosecution argument to make out an “aggression” case out of rendering simple opinion as equally culpable to actual crimes? Yet as Alfred Schaefer well exclaimed to the Munich court judge – and similarly one might say as did Jez Turner to the London court judge – “there is a difference between warning and threatening”.

A great pity is that German law has had no jury system since 1924, when juries were abolished supposedly as a money-saving measure, at a time when the German economy was under great pressure due to the onerous reparations payments imposed at the end of the First World War. (Interestingly, as these trials are occuring in Munich, for a very short time from 1948 to 1950 this city and the rest of Bavaria reintroduced jury trials, but they were scrapped again once the Federal Republic of Germany was established.)

Day 5 of the trial, Thursday July 12.
The morning session was farcical!  It had to be recessed until 13.30.
This late start was because the Court had failed to inform the Stadelheim Prison that Alfred had to appear in court that day!  They were only told about it after Alfred did not show up in the morning when all other actors in the proceedings had duly arrived on time at 09.15, including Monika.
It was just the kind of slack incompetence that Alfred draws on when saying his opponents keep making “own goals”, for when eventually he was brought to the court not until the afternoon, he declared: “Had you let me sleep at home instead of prison I’d have arrived perfectly on time!”  I ask, why goad the court?
In the afternoon Alfred’s video “Brainwashing 9/11 Part 1“, was shown.  Since it has no German version, an official interpreter had made a translation and this German text was read simultaneously during regular pauses while the video was being screened.
Alfred was asked by the judge, how he had reacted after he had “found out about 9/11”?   Alfred said, that at first he had sleepless nights, then he started doing a lot of investigation and research. He reached the conclusion that we are in big trouble, like noticing your house is on fire yet the people inside the house do not notice or dare to deal with its disquiet, disturbance, or danger.   So he felt the obligation to warn and awaken everybody.
Alfred said, “what our judicial system is doing now, is wrapping duct tape around a steaming pressure cooker while turning up the heat on.
  Another question from the judge was, how did Alfred make the step from “9/11” to the “Holocaust”?   Alfred answered that it was the TV interview with Michael Chertoff, which Alfred presents in his video, where Chertoff states that denying the official story of “9/11” is like denying the “Holocaust”.
Day 6 of the trial, Friday July 13.
 As usual in the public gallery there were five persons in the morning, then three by the afternoon. Fewer in the Press gallery.
  Concerning the media,  as observed on the day of the release of (the now late) Ernst Zündel from Mannheim Prison that only one single reporter, from the Associated Press, turned up with a single photographer, thus proving how the internationally syndicated Press relies on one story and one take on how that monopolised story will be presented.  There seems to have been no story of note about the Schaefer trial in the German media to date. Yet one would think news proprietors would estimate that German citizens would be interested to buy newspapers about this dual siblings’ case with its international aspects.  Not least, a general public interest could be expected, bearing on how their country’s laws are seen to be perpetrated on Canadian citizens.
Trial Session DAY 7, Monday, July 16th.
The session began at 09.45 and the whole day was devoted to viewing first Monika’s then Alfred’s videos.
The entire morning was spent on Monika’s case.
Monika was asked questions about her video “Sorry Mum I was Wrong About the Holocaust” by the leading Judge.
Why did she make the film? What was her intention in doing so?
Monika read her Statement (Einlassung), which was considered by some in the public gallery as “very impressive”.  Some of the public hope a full version of it will be made public.
 In the afternoon the video “Dissidenten sprechen Klartext” (Dissidents Speak Out) was shown.  This is an Interview Alfred had with the political firebrand Gerhard Ittner (who is himself now locked away in Nuremberg prison).  Incidentally, Gerd Ittner was the organizer of the Dresden Commemoration, February 2018, who was permitted to organize the demo yet conditionally disqualified from speaking at it himself because of an earlier conviction for “incitement”.  Alfred was one of the scheduled speakers and that transcript was posted here at ANS a few days later.
The judge asked Alfred:  Why this time in this video he does not differentiate between Jews as a whole and the jewish “Großkapital” (Jewish big business), which he had in his “brainwashing” video, shown the day before?  Alfred pointed out that, “if it is okay all the time to blame all Germans for the nazis, why is it that we do not get the same right when referring to the Jews?”.  Why the exceptionalism for some generalisations and not for others?
Finally before close of day the video was shown which was filmed by the German police from Alfred‘s speech in Brezenheim – at the Rhine-Meadow (Rheinwiesenlager) Memorial where one million German POW soldiers were herded there to starve to death in those densely crowded, open muddy fields under the orders of the “Allied victor” General Eisenhower who denied Red Cross access.  At this atrocity-mourning Commemoration in Brezenheim, Alfred is  accused of having made the “Hitler-Gruß“ (the Hitler greeting) at the close of it.  Alfred said he never mentioned Hitler, instead he had shown the “Roman Salute”.
Screen_Shot_2018-07-04_at_4.36.05_PM.png
 A civil liberties group is urging the Canadian government to end the “unjust and immoral” imprisonment of Monika Schaefer.

In a letter signed by executive director Joseph Hickey, the association calls on Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland to act immediately, starting with appointing a consular observer and direct contact for Schaefer.

“We ask you both to do everything you can to save Monika Schaefer from her ongoing unjust and immoral imprisonment in Germany,” the letter says. “Every day that Canada refuses to act or acts ineffectively is a day that Ms. Schaefer spends in a foreign jail. Therefore, we express the required urgency.”

 

Monika has been in custody since her arrest and her trial is set to continue until Aug. 17,  the maximum penalty for each count is three years’ imprisonment.

The Department of Justice referred questions to Global Affairs Canada, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

kuva2_protest-sign

Trial Session DAY 8, Tuesday, July 17th.

The hearing was opened on the eighth day of the trial with the judge’s announcement that the evidence had been closed by August 16, 1818, and that the verdict would be announced on August 17, 1818, because the court did not intend to drag the case into September ,

It was followed by the continuation of the screening of the third video at the point where the day before had to interrupt the session because the translation of the video was not yet complete.

The video explains that the slave trade, in which significant Jews would have been involved , the gas chamber stories, 9/11 and other  false flag operations, showing the tactics were always the same. It also explains why Noam Chomsky’s opinion on 911 is implausible and incorrect. Overall, the Marxist-Leninist indoctrination lasted three generations. Then democratization would be complete, ie the moral decline of society would be recognizable everywhere. For the last step, the complete destabilization of society leading up to a war. 

When asked where he got the quote used in the video of former Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Alfred Schaefer mentions the corresponding bibliography:

” Our race is the master race. We are holy gods on this planet. We are as far from the inferior races as they are from insects. (…) Other races are considered human excrement. Our destiny is to take control of the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leaders with a staff of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as slaves! “- Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset. Found By: Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts,” New Statesman, June 25, 1982.

Alfred Schaefer went on to explain that,” there was little interest in the videos at the beginning, but that there was exponential growth from recent reactions and affirmative commentaries, as the listener and our audience recognized our present situation .”

“I had to do all the videos because otherwise I would have had to look on as an omitted assistance if I had not acted. But I had never pursued evil intentions with my videos. All human beings would sooner or later be confronted with the excesses of the dark machinations.Everything we believe now will be swept away and all the teachers and professors would then have to explain why they had been silent for so long. It was our task to deal with reality and to no longer believe the fantasy stories we were presented.”

 

The judge asked what the new world order would look like and Alfred Schaefer replied, “it would not look like it would systematically destroy 60% of the population.” He also refers to another book which predicts that the invaders would make a friendly face in Western industrial nations as long as they needed us and were dependent on us. But as soon as they reached a certain percentage of the population, they would destroy our civilization. Then a situation would arise that none of us would want and that no one in the developed world would be prepared for.”However, every people should regain their self-determination and not be controlled from the outside by separating us from our roots and making us sick by telling fairy tales. Everywhere in the world it would look just like ours and you come to the same conclusions.”

The judge wants to know how he sees it, if someone has a different view and come to different conclusions and Alfred Schaefer explains, ” this is not a problem, only one can not solve the problem by imparting prohibitions. People are hungry for logical explanations.”

 

Alfred Schaefer goes on to explain , “we were trained with symbols like a dog. The longer you had been at university, the harder people were reachable. That had not happened organically, but that had been made targeted. If you go to the doctor, then you must first know what you are sick, so that you can even initiate a healing process. His work should help to recognize the disease.The illness can not be recognized with evasive and false answers that have made Noam Chomsky himself unbelievable. He was not honest.”

Subsequently, another video entitled “CODOH” was presented, in which three people were asked why they supported the open debate about the HC. The court wanted to know where Alfred and Monika Schaefer knew the interviewees and if there had been a script for the video. Monika Schaefer explains that there was no script, because everyone tried to describe his point of view and one had only want to give food for thought. The answer to the question of whether or not you got money for the video was “No, of course not!” This video was made for the English-speaking countries only and was intended for an open and honest debate to find the truth. Monika and Alfred Schaefer are also always ready to revise their views if they would provide you with valid evidence.

The application for detention in the Alfred Schaefer case was rejected by the court because the postcard that Alfred Schaefer had sent to his relatives was considered a threat.

The next hearing will take place on 26.7.2018.

Write to Monika at the following address:
Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY

Write to Ursula at the following address:
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
Germany

Write to Gerd at the following address:
Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg
Germany

Write to Jez Turner at the following address:
Jez Bedford-Turner A5544EE,
wing E3-02,
HMP Wandsworth,
PO Box 757, Heathfield Road,
Wandsworth, London SW18 3HU.
ENGLAND

Write to Alfred at the following address:
Alfred Erhard Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimerstr. 12
81549 München
GERMANY

Advertisements
Published in: on July 18, 2018 at 1:50 am  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://americannationalsocialist.com/2018/07/18/the-schaefer-trial/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s