By Mike Walsh

Russian citizen Roman Yushkov has been cleared by a Russian court after being charged with making statements that in the West will earn him up to 5-years harsh imprisonment. After being cleared, the acquitted defendant poured out his gratitude.

“Dear friends, I hasten to inform you that an hour ago the jury cast a verdict by a majority of votes (5 against 3) that I am fully acquitted under Article 354.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ‘Rehabilitation of Nazism’.

The jury recognised that I had republished the article by Anton Blagin “Jews! Return Germans money for cheating about the Holocaust Six Millions Jews.”

And in his comments, he denied that six million Jews were killed by the Nazi government. However, as the jury found, there is no crime in his expressing this opinion.

146627_800 (1)

Photo near the court in the city of Perm.

Roman Yushkov went on to write; “Thank you for this, my honest Russian people. The jury also recognised my innocence by a majority vote (again 5 against 3), that I am ‘guilty of humiliating human dignity on the basis of nationality (Article 282) on an additional episode in my criminal case: for publishing the post headlined ‘Stop Feeding Strangers.’

What happened in the heads and hearts of the jury and generally around this verdict? God knows. This means that the judge can judge me only on Monday reconsideration on the verdict on the 282nd article, although the jury 7 against 1 felt that I deserve leniency on it. But this is secondary.


The main thing is our common victory in the so-called Rehabilitation of Nazism laws. No matter how wild it sounds, it was the ‘rehabilitation of Nazism’ that they tried to hang on us for refusing to forget and reminding them of our much worse Russian holocaust and their forever worshiping the (alleged) Jewish Holocaust.”

The full horror of the Bolshevik horror is detailed in the heavily illustrated Michael Walsh books, Trotsky’s White Negroes, Slaughter of a Dynasty and Megacaust.


The dissident went on to say, “The lying and unscrupulous religion of the Jewish Holocaust (in the West) has not yet passed to Russia.  Especially joyful is that the breakthrough occurred in my native Perm. Of course, this poisonous infection will come again and again.


“The prosecutor’s office can try to cancel this verdict of the jury in the appeal. But, we have to fight Jewish Nazism for our poor, long-suffering Motherland with a triple power, just as our grandfathers once fought against the Germans.  But today we won! Thank you to everyone who fought with us in a unified system.” ~ Roman Yushkov.

Murmansk historian Anton Blagin had earlier been charged with publishing an article headlined, “Jews! Return the Germans Money for Holocaust Six Millions Jews Related Fraud.”

His article went on to say: “The cult of the Holocaust is a real new totalitarianism worse than any Stalinist one. If they convict me now, then I certainly will not be the last. The priests of the religion of the Holocaust will taste the human meat, and they will not be stopped.”

The solidarity campaign behind the first persecuted holocaust denial defendant in Russia was launched at his suggestion.


“This is a struggle for the future of our children and grandchildren,” says Anna Sorokina from Irkutsk. She condemned those who had “cowardly decided to sit out, who dumped him (VK) from their list of friends.”

Holocaust Card

Her statement will not be lost on those in the West who abandon holocaust fraud investigators like Ursula Haverbeck (90), Ernst Zündel, Sylvia Stolz, Canadian musician Monika Schaffer, Britain’s Alison Chabloz, and many others imprisoned and heavily fined for saying what Russians are openly allowed to say.


Influence of Jewish lobby in Russia should not be underestimated. They use every opportunity to push their agenda, this time in a legal trial. It is their right, unfortunately, but it is not a policy of the state.

Published in: on November 29, 2018 at 8:47 am  Leave a Comment  

Three American Friends Of Germany During WWII

By Carolyn Yeager

A FRIEND SENT ME THE ARTICLE BELOW ABOUT ERNEST LUNDEEN, an American “isolationist” politician from Minnesota who had a fair-minded and truth-seeking attitude toward the German-Polish conflict and the war of September 1939. Through Lundeen, I’ve learned about a couple others who are also of particular interest to me. Lundeen served in the US House of Representatives from 1917 to 1919, when he was one of 50 Congressmen to vote against the U.S. declaration of war against Germany on April 6, 1917. For this reason he was not renominated by his Republican party. After switching to the Democratic Farmer-Labor party, he was elected again from 1933 to 1937 in the Roosevelt landslide. He then went on to become Minnesota Senator from 1937 until his untimely death in a plane crash on August 31, 1940.

Lundeen’s father, C.H. Lundeen was an early pioneer in South Dakota, where Ernest was born and raised. The Lundeens in the USA come from Norway and Austria, according to ancestry sites. Ernest Lundeen is what I would call a true American patriot.

The article appears at a German-language history website.

Senators Demand a Roosevelt Secret Diplomacy Investigation

On June 12, 1940, an English translation of the “Polish Documents on the Prehistory of the War” issued by the Foreign Office was published in the USA. (1) As mentioned above, the despatches of the Polish ambassadors in Washington, London and Paris, captured in Warsaw, were immediately declared “forgeries” by the US State Department immediately after their publication in Germany. The Polish ambassador, Count Jerzy Potocki, was even urged by Secretary of State Cordell Hull to make a public denial in the New York Times. (2)

At that time, few American politicians could get a complete picture of the contents of the secret documents. But after the businessmanRalph B. Strassburger bought 17,000 copies of the English translation and sent them to journalists, senators and governors throughout America, in the beginning of July 1940 a broad discussion emerged in the media. The Washington Post was the first national daily newspaper to dare to call the papers issued by the German Foreign Office authentic. Most other newspapers tried to downplay the importance of the documents. (3)

Who is Ralph B. Strassburger? 

A wealthy publisher and newspaper owner born in 1883 in Norristown, PA whose great-great grandfather Johann Andreas Strassburger emigrated to the USA from Ober Ingelheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, a little over 100 years previous. Interesting to me, Ralph (Ralf) Strassburger’s great-great grandmother was Eva Yeager, daughter of John Yeager (Jäger) and Eva Elisabeth Schneider, born in Pennsylvania. His grandfather was named Reuben Yeager Strassburger. (See here)

Strangely, everything written about him I have been able to find ends around 1920, even though he lived until 1959. It’s as though some of his activities in those last forty years, which include the above mentioned dissemination of the translated Polish documents which the US State Dept was compelled to label as forgeries, are covered up in joint agreement with his family. Strassburger was proud of his distinguished German ancestors and wrote a book of importance to historians and genealogists: Pennsylvania German Pioneers, published in 1934. Athough baptised by his mother, the former Mary Jane Beaver, in the First Presbyterian Church in Norristown, he followed the creed of his father, the old German Reformed faith. His father was a member of the Reformed Church of Schwenkville, and his great-grandfather was a minister in other reformed congregations.

1920 – Republican National Convention, Chicago, R. B. Strassburger and A. P. Moore (right). Chicago Daily News negatives collection,. Courtesy of the Chicago Historical Society.

Strassburger acquired residences in France in the 1920’s where he successfully bred and raced thorougbred horses until his death, after which his wife continued to do so.

On July 11, 1940, Ernest Lundeen used a Senate meeting to address the issue in the presence of Roosevelt. In a memorable speech he said:

“‘This is my war!’ was proclaimed in Paris in 1914 by the Russian ambassador Isvolsky.

“Our president could also exclaim ‘This is my war!’ when he looks at the catastrophe that threatens to engulf Europe’s culture today. Europeans have now expressed what Americans have long suspected: England, France and Poland would have settled their dispute with Hitler at the conference table if our president had not interfered. The Polish government would never have rejected thesensible proposals of the German leader if Ambassador Bullitt had not promised her the military support of England, France, and America.

Lundeen in his Senate office.

When the Germans conquered Warsaw, they discovered a multitude of documents in the archives. The most prominent among them are byWilliam C. Bullitt, our ambassador in Paris, and Joseph P. Kennedy, our ambassador in London. In front of me are photocopies of the documents the Germans claim to have found in Warsaw. I do not know if these documents are real or not. I hope they are fakes, but I’m afraid they are not. Rather, I fear they are real, and they feed on the reasonable suspicionthat our government has made secret commitments to the Allies.

“From these documents we can see that 
Mr Bullitt assured the Polish Government of America’s hostility to Germany. He also incited Britain to strengthen Poland’s resistance to Germany. This is of great importance because it was precisely this English action that was the main reason for the outbreak of the war. In a letter of March 29, 1939, Ambassador Lukasiewicz wrote to his Foreign Minister in Warsaw that Mr. Bullitt had urged our Ambassador Kennedy in London to liaise with British Prime Minister Chamberlainand ask him to give Poland a British guarantee. This helped decisively to the outbreak of war. Poland was reluctant and unwilling to accept the reasonable German demands. This made any peaceful solution to the Danzig and Corridor problem impossible. AndEngland and France went to war confidently because they believed they had the assurance of rapid American aid.“(4)

At the end of his speech, Lundeen demanded an inquiry by a Senate committee. Many prominent anti-interventionists – including pilot Charles Lindbergh, historian Harry Elmer Barnes, and Senator Gerald P. Nye – joined him.(5) [the following month Lundeen was dead! -cy] However, instead of examining Bullitt’s activities, there was only one investigation into the translation of the documents. That same month, the “House Committee on Un-American Activities” turned to the New York publishing house “Howell & Soskin” and there learned about documents from the German journalist dr. Manfred Zapp translated by the German-American writer George Sylvester Viereck.(6) Both Zapp and Viereck were arrested in the spring of 1941 for spreading “National Socialist propaganda”.

(1) The German White Paper: Full Text of the Polish Documents Issued by the Berlin Foreign Office. Howell & Soskin, New York 1940.
(2) “Berlin Accuses US: Bullitt Quoted as Saying ‘We Will Finish War on the Allies Side’.” In The New York Times vom 30. März 1940, Seite 1.
(3) Justus D. Doenecke Storm on the Horizon: The Challenge to American Intervention, 1939 – 1941. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2003, S. 76.(4) Ernest Lundeen, Six Men and War. Speech of July 11, 1940. Hoover Institution Archive.
(5) Justus D. Doenecke, Storm on the Horizon: The Challenge to American Intervention, 1939 – 1941. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2003, S. 76.
(6) House of Representative Special Committee on Un-American Activities Investigation on Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States. Third Session on H. Res. 282. Appendix – Part II. Washington 1940, S. 1054 – 1059.

Who was George Sylvester Viereck?

A German-American poet, writer and reputed illegitimate grandson of Kaiser Wilhelm I. He came to the United States with his parents in 1896 at the age of twelve. In college, he published his first collection of poems. He continued writing and publishing, gaining national fame. In 1908 he became a Germanophile and his support for Germany and pacifism caused him to be expelled from clubs and fraternal organizations. During WWI he edited a weekly magazine,The Fatherland. After the war, he was expelled from the Poetry Society of America. But in 1923 his popular-science book Rejuvenation: How Steinach Makes People Young brought him international success. He traveled through Europe, stopping in Munich to interview Adolf Hitler and became a well-known supporter of National Socialism. In 1933, Viereck again met with Hitler in Berlin and in 1934, he gave a speech to twenty thousand “Friends of the New Germany” at New York’s Madison Square Garden.

Viereck was convicted in 1942 for “failure to register with the U.S. Department of State as a National Socialist agent” when he set up his publishing house, Flanders Hall, in New Jersey. He was imprisoned for five years. Jews who are agents of Israel, or promote the interests of Israel to our government, are not found in violation of this Foreign Agents Registration Act. Funny how that works.

One thing that comes clear to me from this is that if you were a pro-British propagandist or writer during the war years from 1910 to 1950 or so, you were applauded, assisted and even funded by the governmental and media reigning powers, while if you were pro-German, or even recommended neutrality, you were under suspicion as an enemy of the state. The actual declaraton of war in both wars was just a formality. And little has changed in that regard up till today, whether we are “at war” or not. Germans get thrown in jail, blown up in plane crashes, and blotted out from history.

Published in: on November 27, 2018 at 8:31 pm  Leave a Comment  



“… you can easily see how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”


When JFK was writing about Hitler, his suicide had happened just four months earlier. It shows a side of Kennedy we’ve never seen before.

The young JFK was Germany, just months after the Allied victory. Already a scholar on global politics, Kennedy seems fascinated with Hitler and his place in history.

Kennedy gave the diary to his Senate research assistant Deidre Henderson, who published it in book form in the mid-’90s.


Published in: on November 22, 2018 at 8:38 am  Leave a Comment  



This is the Reichserntedankfest of 1934 in Buckeberg. That year, 700,000 people participated. Even those who did not support the NSDAP were totally blown away and emotionally shaken. They had never experienced anything even remotely like this, there was no rock concerts back then. It created spiritual feeling of sublime and unity among people who were participating. When they were marching back to their tents in the night, they could still see the huge spotlights piercing the sky in the Buckeberg. They were totally pumped up and fell that things are really going to change better.

The official purpose of the festival was the recognition of the achievements of the German farmers, whom the NSDAP called the Reichsnährstand (the Reich’s Food Estate). The celebration was also used by the NSDAP as a propaganda tool to showcase the connection between Adolf Hitler and the German people. The festival was part of a cycle of  celebrations which included the annual party rally at Nuremberg, Hitler’s birthday,  and other important events on the calendar.


Published in: on November 22, 2018 at 8:18 am  Leave a Comment  

NSDAP Anti-Tobacco Movement


The NSDAP banned smoking in restaurants and public transportation systems, citing public health, and severely regulated the advertising  of smoking and cigarettes. There was also a high tobacco tax, and supplies of cigarettes to Wehrmacht were rationed. Several health organizations in Germany even began claiming that smoking heightened the risk of miscarriages by pregnant women, now a commonly know fact.
* Image – A NSDAP-era anti-smoking ad titled “The chain-smoker” reading: “He does not devour it, it devours him” (from the anti-tobacco publication Reine Luft, 1941
Published in: on November 20, 2018 at 9:11 am  Leave a Comment  

Hermann Göring – Feldherrnhalle March


By Hermann Göring

In Bavaria the Party had already reached its zenith. At the same time the Bavarian Government Party considered that the time had come to exploit the general discontent with the Berlin Government: they would move to the attack and therewith split the Reich. Hitler himself was firmly resolved to prevent this happening and to use the disgust with Berlin to organize a united and general attack against the Government of the Reich as such. The events which led up to the so-called Hitler Putsch are well known and it would take up too much space to describe them here. On the 9th November, 1923, on the fifth anniversary of the shameful November revolt, it was planned to strike the decisive blow. Confidently trusting the solemn promises of von Kahr, Lossow and Seisser (Government, Army and Police), Hitler, in the night from the 8th to the 9th November, proclaimed the new Germany and declared the Government of the Reich to be removed from office. On the following day the march to Berlin was to have started. We know today that Herr von Kahr, as representing Catholic and Wittelsbach tendencies, had planned quite a different action for the 12th November. And so the movement, without knowing it, had, by its action, saved the unity of the Reich.

At about noon on the 9th November the first of the unarmed marching and singing columns of the fighters for freedom were treacherously shot down by the police near the Feldherrnhalle in Munich. Eighteen sacrificed their lives and many more were wounded. Beside Hitler marched General Ludendorff, and beside Ludendorff myself as commanding officer of the Storm Troops. Hitler and Ludendorff were saved as by a miracle. I myself fell, seriously wounded by two shots. Abruptly and brutally the rattle of the machine-guns had wrecked the rejoicings and had murdered the hope of freedom. Once more, as has happened several times in German history, treachery prevented victory. The young movement which had only just sprung up, seemed already destroyed. The followers were dispersed, the leaders in prison, wounded or in exile. To the weak, once more discouraged, it seemed as if Germany was now finally lost.

But it soon became clear that these sacrifices had not been in vain. The seed sown in blood began wonderfully to put out shoots. The fighters, the activities, were united more firmly than ever. Hitler himself was stronger, more experienced, more confident in the future than ever before. During his imprisonment the situation seemed hopeless. But he had hardly been released when the enormous attractive force of this leader and prophet became apparent. He took the banner into his own hands again, and immediately the old fighters gathered round him afresh and thousands of new ones as well. The movement was now established not only in Bavaria, but also in North Germany. With the march to the Feldherrnhalle in Munich the young movement had made its entry into world history, and had taken over the leadership and direction of the struggle for freedom, honour, work and bread which was now beginning. For the future no other organization could lay claim to the same position. It was a Middle-class Government which had given the order to shoot down the soldiers of National Socialism at the Feldherrnhalle. And therewith many honest German workers lost the last traces of mistrust towards the movement. The Middle Class parties could no longer take in the people with the lie that they represented the nation. At the Feldherrnhalle they had come out in their true colours, and there it was that National Socialism finally tore from the Bourgeoisie their distorted idea of Nationalism. In the same way the movement could no longer allow the Social Democrats to call themselves the representatives of Socialism. The Middle Classes had taken the sublime conception of Nationalism, which is to promote the good of the whole people, and had degraded it to jingoism, which has its roots in alcohol and in the winning of profits. In the same way the Social Democrats’ had taken the pure conception of Socialism, which means service to the community and the right of each individual to live a decent life, and had degraded it to a mere question of food and wages.

Germany was split into two hostile camps; on the one hand the Proletariat, and on the other the Middle Classes. The Middle Classes appeared as the representatives of Nationalism, hated by the workers as the symbol of compulsion and oppression; the Proletariat, hated and feared by the cowardly Bourgeoisie, appeared as the symbol of destruction and the abolition of private property. The two ideas seemed mutually exclusive and inevitably opposed to each other. lf the one side seemed to offend against the nation, then the other side offended against the people. There could be no bridge built between the two parties; there could be no reconciliation. Hitler saw that the distortion of these two ideas had brought about the division of the people, and that as long as they remained distorted no unity was possible. Therefore he took the symbols from both parties and melted them in the crucible of our philosophy to make a new synthesis. The result was National Socialism, which is the unique and indissoluble union of the two ideas at their deepest and finest. He explained to the workers that there can be no socialism, no socialist justice, unless one is prepared to recognize the good of the whole nation. He who would better the lot of the individual must be ready to better the lot of the whole nation. At the same time he convinced supporters of the Middle Classes that they could never achieve national strength and unity unless they were ready to grant each individual fellow-countryman his rights, unless they were ready to look upon the lot of each individual fellow-countryman as their own personal concern. He explained to both sides that Nationalism and Socialism are not mutually exclusive, but are absolutely necessary to each other. He thus combined both ideas to one philosophy, and he had then logically to bring the representatives of the two ideas together and to unite them and thus achieve national solidarity. And so it will always remain Hitler’s greatest merit that he did not bridge over the gulf between Proletariat and Bourgeoisie, but filled it in by hurling both Marxism and the Bourgeois parties into the abyss. Thus the ruinous war between classes and parties was brought to an end, and the unity of the nation and the solidarity of the people was achieved.

Published in: on November 20, 2018 at 9:00 am  Leave a Comment  

Interview Staff Martin Kerr

transcript of an interview between NEW ORDER Chief of Staff Martin Kerr and Rosmarie Macleod, host of the online broadcast The Voice of National Socialist Reason. This interview took place on November 4, 2018, on Mixlr, at

Martin Kerr at the NSWPP headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, 1981.

ROSEMARIE MACLEOD: Tell us a little bit about your background. How did you get involved in the Movement?

MARTIN KERR: I was born in Pennsylvania in 1952. May ancestors were of Scottish, English and German descent, and helped to settle the state. When I was three or four years old, our family moved to New Jersey. I grew up is a small White suburban community about 20 miles outside of New York City. I had a safe and comfortable middleclass existence. I attended public schools and the local Presbyterian church.

I first became interested in National Socialism in 1966, when I was 14 years old. I was aware, through reading the newspapers and watching the news on television, that American society was facing many problems, including racial unrest, the spread of communism and the war in Vietnam. It was also apparent to me that the solutions to these problems did not consist of those offered by democracy, capitalism or the churches – they were the very ones who had allowed the problems to arise in the first place! So I was casting about for solutions.

I read an interview with George Lincoln Rockwell and was very impressed by his honesty. Here was someone who was tackling the problems that we were facing – especially racial problems – in a direct and forthright manner. We didn’t use the term back then, but today we would say that he was “thinking outside the box.” I wrote to Commander Rockwell and asked him if I could join the American Nazi Party. Within a week I had received an answer in the mail, and I promptly signed up in the party’s youth wing, the National Socialist Youth Movement, which was the same as the Hitler Youth.

As you can imagine, my parents were unhappy with this development, and they prevented any further involvement by me in National Socialist politics for the time being. However, I kept my National Socialist faith, and by my junior year in high school I was attending meetings and demonstrations of the National Renaissance Party in New York City.

I was one on the founding associates when party commander Matt Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. In Commander Koehl’s last will, he indicated that he wanted me to follow him as the leader of the NEW ORDER. I have been in charge of NEW ORDER operations since his death in October 2014. I formally re-affiliated with the NSWPP in 1971. From 1973 through 1977 I served with the Los Angeles Unit of the party. From June 1977 until 1984 I worked at the party’s national headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. My primary responsibility there was public outreach, in particular, editing the party’s written publications.

RM: Different people have different definitions of National Socialism. What does it mean to you?

MK: There are different levels to National Socialism. What most people understand by the term is its superstructure, that is to say its outward policies and form. In that sense, National Socialism is a dynamic racial movement that seeks to safeguard and advance the interests and welfare of White people both here in the US and worldwide.

Using Hitler’s Germany as a model, the NEW ORDER seeks to create a National Socialist state for White Americans. Now, it is not the case that we are trying to replicate the Third Reich on American soil, in the sense of copying it identically in every little detail. Rather, our goal is to apply basic National Socialist principles in an American context, taking into account America’s history, its racial and ethnic demographics, and its geography, as well as the unique character of the American personality.

But underneath this political superstructure rests the philosophical basis of National Socialism, which does not change over time, or from one country to the next.

National Socialism is a worldview, or a Weltanschauung, to use the German term. We believe that the Universe is governed by natural laws. For Man to be healthy and prosperous, he must first acknowledge that these laws exist; secondly, he must discern what they are; and finally, he must follow them. This process is true both for individuals and for our race as a whole.

My good friend and comrade Povl Riis-Knudsen, the Danish National Socialist, has devised a one-sentence definition of National Socialism that serves very well: National Socialism is the application of the laws of Nature to human affairs.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER? What separates it from other pro-White organizations?

MK: The NEW ORDER is a vanguard National Socialist organization. Our doctrine is derived directly from Mein Kampf and other Hitlerian sources.

Here is what we are not:

• We are not White Nationalists;
• We are not White separatists;
• We are not Alt-Right;
• We are not Balk Right;
• We are not Christian Identists;
• We are not Satanists;
• We are not Identitarians;
• We are not National Bolsheviks or Strasserites

Our goal is to promote strict, hardline Hitlerian National Socialism, and not something else. We try to stay on good footing with other pro-White groups that are not National Socialist, and we wish them no ill will. Anything that moves White people in the general direction of National Socialism is worthwhile, in our opinion. But ultimately there is only one movement qualified to lead White people into the future, and that movement is National Socialism, embodied in North America as the NEW ORDER.

The NEW ORDER traces its organizational descent directly to George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, later renamed the National Socialist White People’s Party. When Commander Rockwell was assassinated in 1967, party leadership devolved to Matt Koehl.

As I mentioned earlier, Commander Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. So our organizational history goes back some six decades.

Also, from our earliest days, commanders Rockwell and Koehl had contact with the remnants of the original Hitler movement in Germany, through comrades such as Arthur Axmann, Otto Remer, Gudrun Burwitz-Himmler, Bruno Ludtke, Hans-Ulrich Rudel, Winifred Wagner, Hans Baur, Florentine Rost van Tonnigen, Hanna Reitsch, Hans Severus Ziegler and others.

No other pro-White or National Socialist group has and organizational pedigree that even comes close to ours.

I mentioned earlier that we a “vanguard organization.” Our predecessor, the National Socialist White People’s Party, was designed as a mass-oriented political formation. The NEW ORDER, in contrast, does not seek to recruit the masses of people into its ranks, or much less to solicit their support in elections.

Rather, we are looking for a small number of highly motivated, exceptional people – an elite – who are fully committed to the National Socialist cause.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER’s stand on religion?

MK: The NEW ORDER is incorporated in Virginia as a non-profit religious organization. Our leadership views National Socialism as our religion. For us, the tenets of the National Socialist worldview fulfill all of the spiritual requirements for a new religious faith. Sometimes people refer to this as the Hitler Faith or Esoteric Hitlerism.

Our critics sometimes claim that we worship Adolf Hitler as a “god,” but this is a misunderstanding or deliberate distortion of our belief.

Our founder, Matt Koehl, put our perception of Adolf Hitler as follows:

There is but one Supreme Being, one Ultimate Source of all causation — one great Primal Power, infinite and eternal — which we recognize. We are all creations of this Power. Once in thousands of years, however, a singular and unique figure appears, whose special mission it is to declare anew the Divine Will and to redefine human history. In so doing, he himself becomes a universal symbol. In recent time, this extraordinary, providential figure appeared in the person of — Adolf Hitler.With his miraculous appearance, a new age on Earth has begun. That is why we honor and revere him. (Source: FAQ)

Thus our attitude towards Adolf Hitler is not one of “worship,” as the term is commonly understood, but rather one of veneration.

So, this is our belief. But we do not attempt to force our religious insights on our followers. How somebody views the Divine is up to them, it’s a matter of personal conscience. Everyone has to find their own path to God.

We have as supporters people who are Christians, or Odinists, or atheists. We even have a few Buddhists. Savitri Devi famously embraced Hinduism. As long as someone is an Aryan and they support National Socialism, they are welcome in our ranks, regardless of religious conviction. Religious intolerance and persecution are un-Aryan.

RM: Does the NEW ORDER have a plan? What is its strategy?

MK: For obvious reasons, we are not going to reveal our strategy to the public in any detail, but I can speak about it in general terms.

Broadly speaking, there are two different strategic approaches that hardline pro-Whites have utilized over the years: the mass-approach and the vanguard strategy.

The mass-approach consists on enlisting as many people as possible into the movement as quickly as possible. It is characterized by public demonstrations, publicity seeking, a high media profile and public name recognition. Little or no attention is paid to building a solid infrastructure, nor in ideological development, nor in quality control concerning those recruited.

The mass-approach results in a lot of publicity and attention, and in a relatively larger membership. But the organizations that adopt this approach normally do not last long. They are filled with infiltrators and other troublemakers. The publicity that they receive is almost always negative. Their average existence is about two years, after which they disband or fade away, only to be replaced by similar dead-end organizations. This is not the approach that the NEW ORDER is taking.

Instead, we are pursuing a vanguard strategy. This is characterized by slow growth and consolidation, by intensive theoretical development, and by careful attention as to whom we recruit. We have small numbers, a low public profile, and little engagement with the media. We spend most of our effort and resources is building a solid infrastructure. Our public activities are limited. Their goal is to spread our message as far and wide as possible among the broad masses of our racial sisters and brothers.

We have encountered groups which claim that they pursue both strategies simultaneously, that is, a mass strategy accompanied by intenstive infrastructutal development. But realistically, given the limited resources that pro-Whites have at their disposal, you cannot do both at once; you have to choose one to focus on.

Our mid-range goal is to create a nationwide network of local National Socialist communities, which we term folk strongholds. We will have more to say about this in the future. However, as I said before, we do not intend to broadcast our plans to the public. We prefer to boast about our accomplishments after they have been made – not beforehand.

RM: How can people help out if they support the NEW ORDER and its beliefs? Where can people go if they want more information on the NEW ORDER?

MK: The basic level of affiliation to the NEW ORDER is that of Registered Supporter. An RS is someone who states that they are in agreements with our beliefs and who agrees to pay a monthly financial pledge to help support our operations. They have to fill out a registration form which includes a postal address. The NEW ORDER is an organization that is based in the real world. We have no Registered Supporters who are anonymous, or who are only known to us online.

If someone still wants to support our work, but they do not want to make the formal commitment of becoming a Registered Supporter, one thing that they can do is to subscribe to out print publication, the NS BULLETIN. It has been published continuously since 1967.

Further information on our Registered Supporter program and on subscribing to the NS BULLETIN can be found at the “About and Contact” page on our blog. (About and Contact)

Some people want to support us by making a financial contribution. We are now in the middle of our Fall Building Campaign, the goal of which is to raise $5,000 above our normal income. Donations of any size may be made to our post office box address in the form of check, money order or well-concealed cash. Money orders are a good option for those who want to donate anonymously, but do not trust sending cash through the mail.

To hear the original broadcast of this interview, go to: https:///

Select “Sun 04 Nov 2018”

Published in: on November 14, 2018 at 9:30 am  Leave a Comment  

The Dangers of Ed-jew-cation


By Quintus Sertorius

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Charles Yancey, 1816.

A people ignorant of their own heritage are doomed to be a servile people. Shorn of a deeper connection to their past, an ignorant people will likewise lose any responsibility for the future and will quickly devolve into pathetic sub-humanism, actuated only by base animalistic urges, lurid escapist fantasy, and instant gratification. Such a people are incapable of great achievements, and quickly become incompetent even with respect to their own self-interest. Ultimately, the continued existence of an ignorant people will be subservient to the whims of those who hold proudly to their history, the accomplishments of their forebears, and their culture. It is for these reasons that the jews have so thoroughly infested the academic institutions of White nations.

Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, 1789.

The jews have subverted the process of learning throughout White societies, and they perniciously attempt to make it as difficult as possible for individuals to learn by banning the distribution of books, attempting to censor the internet, and foreclosing conversation or debate on topics that do not meet with Hebraic approval. The depredations of the jews have turned our schools into ill-conceived multi-racial anthropology experiments that resemble something between a circus and a prison. Two generations ago, Revilo P. Oliver decried the fact that our schools no longer provided an education, but instead merely provided training – sadly our jew-controlled schools have reached yet another low. They disguise propaganda as knowledge, and inculcate a deleterious egotism in the student-victims, so that they react with moronic anger or arrogant disdain when confronted with the fact that there could be knowledge beyond their ken. The broad base of practical and theoretical knowledge that once nurtured the capacity for creativity unique to the White race is conspicuously absent from today’s thoroughly jew-infested educational institutions. Modern curriculums are surreptitiously designed and executed by jews to stifle the intellectual curiosity, the spirit of exploration, and the drive for self-improvement – all traits found in greater degrees among the White race, and sometimes called the “Faustian spirit” that propels us to the forefront of innovation and true human progress. Instead of developing the discipline and skills to support autodidacticism, the current kosher curriculums demand hyper-specialization which paradoxically encourages a narcissism of intellect, while at the same time instilling a mentality of helplessness in the immeasurably large areas of life outside the narrow field of hyper-specialization. This process produces automatons well suited to work that is, in reality, menial and unthinking but hidden behind byzantine complexity; a complexity that exists in large part to disguise the fact that the work is meaningless drudgery.

Our plague of jewish-trained over-specialized “experts” believe themselves to be at the pinnacle of human brilliance because they can stolidly recite sections of a corporate human resources policy, or follow the instructions for using a JavaScript library. Meanwhile, the very existence of real knowledge and true learning becomes forgotten. In their absence, formerly prosperous White societies coarsen and decay as hedonism and degeneracy supplant the rigor and self-respect needed for creativity to blossom. True enlightenment becomes unattainable – as has long been the plan of our implacable racial enemies, the jews.

We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated.” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol. No. 9.

What, precisely, can one expect to find in the brainwashing centers formerly known as schools? One need not look far for examples that make plain the insidious jewish role in subverting our educational institutions.  Recently, the University of San Francisco began offering a class called “Black-Jewish Relations.” Taught by a low-functioning jewess and a living fossil whose credentials include four years in prison for seven drug and weapons convictions, student-victims can shackle themselves with debt in order to hear Yiddish poems about “Whiteness,” and share their “personal recollections of prejudice and discrimination.” Needless to say, in the California failed-state the classroom is packed with a sullen mob of opportunistic Asian termites and Mestizo scavengers, and even an Israeli zookeeper likely wondering when this pack of feral non-Whites will be sufficiently trained to release into unsuspecting, apathetic White communities.

We will establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress. We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory. In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it to a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political…” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 5.

The institutions that once formed the foundation of our White societies, and once existed for the benefit and advancement of White nations, have been corrupted by kosher connivance into the very tools being used to eradicate us from our homelands. Nowhere is this more evident than in our schools. The most vulnerable members of the White race, our children, are offered up as free-range victims for the violence of the dangerous, civilizationally incompatible sub-human sewage that floods our schools in the name of “diversity.” Education has degenerated into a system of indoctrination promoting jewish aggrandizement and White hatred. It consumes the most impressionable, idealistically-driven, and energetic years of our youth; it cannot be foolishly entrusted to the rabidly anti-White jews, no matter how disingenuously they pretend to be educational “experts.” The only fields of jewish expertise are usury, lying, and White genocide. It is our responsibility to protect the future of our race from these toxic, Judaic influences. We must constantly prepare ourselves so that we are able to counteract the jewish malignancies that have turned education into a weapon that destroys White minds and enervates White souls. We must not allow our children to be saturated in the jewish promotion of degeneracy, deviancy, and miscegenation for twelve years in what are ostensibly called schools. We must stop the jewish-orchestrated White genocide.

Published at

Published in: on November 12, 2018 at 8:12 pm  Leave a Comment  

A New Folk


By Commander Matt Koehl 

FOR YEARS we have talked about saving the white race and defined that as the main purpose for which we were fighting. But the matter requires closer examination.

Let me pose this question: Is the white race worth saving? If so, why?

Lincoln Rockwell worked, fought and died thinking that he could rally his fellow white men for a better world. His reward? Mockery, indifference, rejection and persecution by the very ones he was trying to save.

Today, the situation hasn’t gotten any better. If anything, it has gotten worse. Most white people simply do not care. Not only do they not care, but they are prepared to accept any outrage and indignity, as long as their personal creature comforts and pleasures are not disturbed.

You all know what I am talking about. More often than not, our own people prove to be our own worst enemy. As a result, it is all likely to lead one to discouragement and despair.

So again, I ask the question: Is the white race worth saving? Is it really worth fighting for?


“But,” you say, “did Adolf Hitler give up on his people after World War I, when things also looked bleak and the public he was trying to reach seemed caught up in left- and right-wing madness?”

Aha. No, he did not. But there are three important distinctions here:

First, despite the general decadence of the Weimar period, the German people as a whole were not nearly as decadent as American whites today. Even most rank-and-file Social Democrats and Communists were basically sound, despite their mistaken ideology.

Second there was a ferment for radical change, in which the populace was interested in a bit more than fun and games and personal consumption.

Third, the German people were not only of one basic racial stock, but they comprised a Volk.

None of these factors apply to the North American situation today. Not only are we dealing with a far more decadent population, and not only is there no ferment for real change, but above all, there is no true folk on this continent.

For the most part, the white race in North America is a heterogeneous agglomeration of individuals, with no common sense of ethnic identity — unlike all the various racial minorities in our midst. Whites have forgotten their European roots and heritage. They have become “Americans” — which can encompass just about any featherless biped on the planet capable of landing on these shores.

That is our dilemma. That’s the objective reality we must confront. We have no ethnos, no folk. White people in North America have no recognized ethnic center to which they can appeal.


So, once again: Is the white race worth saving?

And here, the first question we must ask is: What do we mean by “white race”?

If we are referring to a majority of the present so-called white race, then our answer to the original question must be a most definite and emphatic “no.” Because decadent peoples and races have no claim to survival.

Here we can forget about the mass of brain-dead and those committed to death, rather than to life. We must, for example, be prepared to write off race-mixers, the degenerate purveyors of sodomy, those who adopt non-whites, self-hating types out on a guilt trip, and all the nominally white freaks and zombies and those of deficit character one finds on trash TV — as well as all those whites who have given up and refuse to fight in the face of the greatest threat to our race.

The sad fact is that the so-called white race is suffering from hundreds of years of dysgenic breeding. Fortunately, many — if not most — of its defective and worthless numbers will perish, as the Old Order goes down to final collapse.

And that is Nature’s way: Weak whites must be weeded out, so that the healthy and strong may survive to propagate. We certainly do not want to see everything white survive. Because that would mean that we would have to include race-mixers, like O.J.’s late Nicole Simpson, those weird, whigger speciments we find on trash TV, and all the rest. This is not what we are fighting for.

If, on the other hand, in speaking of the race we are referring not to everything that calls itself white, but rather to that small, relatively uncontaminated segment which bears the potential for higher evolutionary development, then our answer to the question of salvageable worth must be a resounding “YES!”


The problem is this: Races do not live — and cannot be saved — in toto as abstract, taxonomical entities, but only as distinct peoples, folks — Völker. And National Socialism — and hence, a requisite National Socialist solution — can only be applied within the context of such a folk, i.e., of a genetically related population with shared values, ideals, hopes, dreams and aspirations, as well as a sense of common identity.

But what we do when no such folk exists — as is the case here in America today?

The answer is quite obvious and very simple: If the white race is to survive on this continent, a new folk must be formed.

But a folk — ein Volk — does not just pop up instantaneously at the snap of the fingers, like some popular pain remedy. It requires generations of common living experience for even a modest start.

Yet, that is the very process — one of folk-formation — which we must consciously pursue, if Aryankind is to have any future on this continent and in the world.


So, how do we get started? Here we must first understand what our task is not.

•  It is not one of appealing to masses of the brain-dead.

•  It is not one of running candidates for public office.

•  It is not one of concerning ourselves with ephemeral political issues, issues which are transient and about which we cannot do anything anyway. Remember that we are not going to solve problems of the world, until we have first gotten our own house in order.

•  Our task is not one of playing “revolution” or trying to revive the Third Reich.

•  It is not one of trying to save everything white, such as the Nicole Simpsons of the world, guilt-ridden self-haters, or the types who appear regularly in public confessions on trash TV.

Saving the race does not require preserving everything white. Rather, it involves salvaging and mobilizing that small number which comprises the best elements of our race. This is the raw material which will form the basis for a new folk — not the indifferent, self-centered, brainless flotsam of a decadent, materialistic, consumer society.


There are three basic types of people in contemporary society. Our Leader has described these as the very best, the very worst, and those in between the two. What we are talking about here are not artificial class or social divisions, but ethica lgradations within the populace.

The best may be described as idealists, those willing to subordinate their own personal interests to the greater good of the whole. The worst are the opposite: those who always place their own selfish interests above everything else. While one category embodies social virtue, the other reflects social vice.

Both of these categories, however, comprise but a small fraction of the total population. Standing between the two is the broad mass of people, who exhibit a mixture of virtue and vice. When the best element is dominant in society — as was the case in National Socialist Germany — the better, more idealistic qualities of the average person also predominate. On the other hand, when the worst elements are dominant — as is the case today — the reverse is true: the worst, meanest, most selfish and materialistic side of ordinary men and women becomes the social norm.

In laying the foundation for a new folk, therefore, what we must seek is that minority of racial idealists scattered about in the general population, to the exclusion of the other two categories.

What we are talking about is not a majority, but a minority of will and determination, one which will one day succeed, where a decadent white majority has repeatedly failed.


Right now, there are at least 160,000 racial brothers and sisters scattered about in North America, who think and feel exactly as we do. It is our job to identify them, reach them, and bring them into our ranks.

And beyond these 160,000, there are at least another 1,600,000 who share our fundamental ideals and values, but who have not yet achieved ideological clarity and understanding, whom we must educate.

Finally, there are at least 16,000,000 of good Aryan racial stock among the broad mass of the population, who are confused and perhaps even superficially hostile, but who must nevertheless be won over for a better world.

These are the fractional numbers we are working with. But never mind. These are the ones for whom we are fighting, the ones who represent the future of our race!

Are you beginning to see, now, what is meant when we refer to a “new folk” in our introductory leaflet “What Is the NEW ORDER?”


There are four stages, or phases, in the process of folk-formation, which we describe as: (I) IDEA; (II) MOVEMENT; (III) COMMUNITY; and (IV) FOLK.

The First Phase is one of advancing and propagating the Idea, articulated as a revolutionary new faith, to provide a spiritual foundation and infrastructure for the mobilization of those racial idealists we seek.

In advancing the Idea, we set the proper tone for racial discourse, by showing the relevance and significance of the Hitlerian message. In so doing, we establish a practical working field of common aspiration, will and consciousness. All of this, of course, is based on the premise that before there can be effective action, there must first be a common outlook, a common vision and common values as the basis for a common will.

The Second Phase is that of building the Movement. To the extent that the First Phase has accomplished the necessary preliminary work, this phase runs concurrently with it.

And here, we just understand a few basics:

(1)  All talk of gaining political power is a nonstarter, without consideration of the necessary preliminaries.

(2)  As the Old Order collapses, the political structure will be the last facet of this decaying order to collapse.

(3)  Before there can be a new state, there must first be a movement constitutiong the embryonic nucleus of the coming order.

(4)  The struggle for a New Order will involve protracted struggle.

The Third Phase involves the organic development of a National Socialist community out of the Movement struggle for a New Order. In the disintegrating circumstances and uncertainties of the future, the Movement must evolve into a social unit capable of acting autonomously and independently of the System and eventually meeting all the vital needs of our people.

The Fourth and final Phase is the culmination of the process, with the emergence of a biological unit — a proto-Folk. Such a folk can be considered to have come into existence when, out of a National Socialist community, a third or fourth successive generation of National Socialists has been born and reared as part of a self-perpetuating ethnic body.

Only with the creation of such an ethnic identity will there be the necessary organic basis, not only for racial survival but also for successful definitive action leading to the establishment of the coming New Order.

In summary, then, the correct path to the New Order proceeds from the Idea to the Movement, then to a Community and on to a new Folk — in that order.


Some have suggested trying to shortcut the process by creating a white racial community, without first embracing the Idea or the Movement. They have advanced the idea of reaching the Promised Land by having large white families and simply breeding themselves into power! Apart from practical, economic realities involved in implementing such a scheme, things cannot possibly work out in that way. Consider this:

(a)  Every offspring produced would not automatically become a National Socialist and, indeed, could well turn out hostile to the very concept of a better world. Even if one were to have a dozen children, it would count for nothing, unless those produced became committed contributors to this Cause. Barring that proviso, and aside from any separate biological considerations, the selective process necessary for folk-formation would be thwarted.

(b)  Turning inward at this early stage and neglecting those tens and hundreds of thousands — yes, millions — of Aryans outside our ranks today would detract from the vital work of recruiting this idealist element from out of the general population. If the idea of mere biological breeding were to become the focus of our efforts, it would smother the Idea and kill the Movement in its attempt to leapfrog past these vital prerequisites, which hold the key to our future progress and development.

Eventually, of course, a National Socialist community and folk will want to adopt a policy of large families to replenish our ranks and overcome any numerical deficiency. Then we can regularly expect to see families with eight to 12 children. But that time has not yet arrived.

Without recognizing the inherent decadence of the majority of contemporary whites, and without a proper spiritual idea and faith and accompanying set of values upon which to base such an effort, any such breeding program is doomed to failure.

Similarly, any mere survivalist enterprise or gated community without an articulated spiritual core — in this case a Hitlerian religious faith — is untenable in the long run and is no substitute for the formation of a true folk.


I have already mentioned the three types of people in our society. Actually, we can now simplify things by describing just two types of white people: (a) those of destiny; and (b) those slated for extinction.

And here, we are not speaking of people who happen to be white, but of a folk that is Aryan — meaning “noble,” in the truest sense of the word — as well as of those who have the potential to become part of this folk.

Creation is not just something that occurred but once in the past; it is an ongoing, evolutionary process that has never stopped.

Nietzsche once spoke of a new folk as a precondition for the Übermensch — the superman, superior man, Homo superbus. What this folk involves is selection of the best. For higher evolution to occur, it is absolutely requisite that there be this process of selection and separation.

Our National Socialist watchword is: “Ein Volk / Ein Reich / Ein Führer.”

In the person of Adolf Hitler — the Leader and Guide sent to us by Providence — we have our Führer. In the coming New Order, we see the Thousand-Year Reich promised by our Leader.

Finally, in a new folk embracing the highest ideals of the Führer, we recognize that renewed, regenerate body of our race, yet to be constituted for the fulfillment of His will here on Earth: His Volk.

Providence has already begun the process of creating this new folk — the true Volk of Adolf Hitler — and we are part of this dynamic process. And it is this folk, in turn, which will one day be capable of undertaking all those measures necessary for the accomplishment of His New Order and the fulfillment of our high destiny as Aryans.

Published in: on November 9, 2018 at 10:10 am  Leave a Comment  

Other Losses

WW2 death camp Rhine Meadow

German POWs Mass Murdered in Blatant War Crime and Violation of the Geneva Convention
In the final days of the Second World War, as the Allies advanced deep into Germany and the German Army was on the verge of defeat, the U.S. Army captured approximately 3 million German prisoners of war.
Under the direction of jewish General Dwight Eisenhower, most of these German POWs were taken to open fields in the area of the Rhine River valley in Western Germany and given no access to food, water, or shelter — and simply left to die.   This was a blatant war crime and violation of international treaty requiring humane treatment of prisoners of war, and release of POWs after the cease of hostilities.  The American military attempted to justify this war crime by simply relabeling the German POWs as “disarmed enemy forces”, therefore alleging that the prisoners were still “hostile enemy forces”.These were the real death camps of World War Two, not the slave labor and internment camps run by the Germans in the alleged jewish “holocaust”, which is a jewish fraud and lie

Over one million German POWs were deliberately murdered in the captivity of the American-run camps.

Published in: on November 9, 2018 at 9:06 am  Leave a Comment