Nordic Resistance Take To Turku Streets

NRM1

Turku city officials decided to quietly observe the first anniversary of the deadly knife attacksthat claimed the lives of two victims and injured eight others on Saturday, and no official commemorative events were planned.

Last August, 22-year-old failed asylum seeker Abderrahman Bouanane from Morocco killed two people and wounded several others as he went on a stabbing spree in the west coast city.

He has since been convicted in court of a terror offense, inspired by Islamic militants in the Middle East.

“We don’t think the tragic crime or its perpetrator deserve commemoration. We will honour the victims and people who helped by working every day with other officials and with civil society to improve security, cultural understanding and the integration of immigrants,” Turku Mayor Minna Arve told Yle News.

The decision by city authorities to refrain from open observances did not stop other groups from turning out on Saturday, however.

The Nordic Resistance Movement PVL gathered hundreds of supporters for a procession through the streets of the city. Marchers joined a chant calling for freedom of speech and named individuals whom they said were traitors to the people, including President Sauli Niinistö, Foreign Minister Timo Soini and Foreign Trade and Development Minister Kai Mykkänen.

The Nordic Resistance Movement has appealed a ban on its activities in Finland issued by the Pirkanmaa District Court last December. The Turku Appeal Court will hear the case from 28-30 August and is expected to deliver a verdict by the end of September.

NRM2

Members of the Turku City Council – except the Finns Party – had signed a declaration against Saturday’s Nordic Resistance Movement rally.

However, Mauri Peltokangas, a Finns Party council member from Kaustinen, was one of the main speakers at a nationalist event to which NRM members continued after their march. Finns Party Member of Parliament Kike Elomaa was also present at  events today.

Police made preemptive arrests of far left protesters coming from Helsinki to Turku to join the anti-Nazi demonstration. Armed police stopped a bus on the motorway, and detained three people on board.

Available for sale at the demonstration where these brilliant Lego figures.

NR-2

NS-1

Advertisements
Published in: on August 19, 2018 at 4:08 am  Leave a Comment  

Inside The Cell Of Codreanu.

tumblr_ohbib1MLuz1s73k0so4_1280.jpg

tumblr_ohbib1mluz1s73k0so2_1280

tumblr_ohbib1mluz1s73k0so3_1280

Published in: on August 13, 2018 at 2:15 am  Leave a Comment  

Messerschmitt Bf.109 and Hans Meyer

tumblr_oe1wt1Q7tw1rqpszmo1_1280.jpg

tumblr_oe1wt1Q7tw1rqpszmo2_1280.jpg

Hans Meyer was born in 1927 and grew up in Brandenburg, Germany. Ever since his youth he was interested in aviation, so at the age of 14, Hans joined the Flieger-HJ and learned to fly the Schneider SG-38 (Flying Glider). When he was 16, he earned himself the Glider Pilot Proficiency Badge ‘C’ level and signed up for the Luftwaffe a year later in 1944 to become a fighter pilot.

After Hans completed his flight training in Werneuchen with the Messerschmitt Bf 109, he was transferred to Jagdgeschwader 54 “Grünherz” and was stationed on the Eastern Front. There he distinguished himself as a fighter pilot and was credited with a total of 5 air victories.

Look for his Book “One Soldier From The Other Side” by Hans Meyer and Lar Stampe.

Published in: on August 12, 2018 at 1:24 am  Leave a Comment  

The Eagle Once The Horst Wessel

eagle-HW1

Amazing synchronicity how certain symbols come to be revealed at certain times by certain people. The Ghost Ship returns, this is a beautiful example of what a Ghost Ship is, it is something that endures, with no adequate rational explanation, other then to remind one of something that has been lost, it travels deep within one’s own rare blood, only a few will see it, but when they see it they see the beauty of it, like this NAZI Ghost ship of the seas, when seen it also spells Doom, as we say “The Ghost in a false reality is real”, here is an example of El Caleuche, USCGC Eagle/Horst Wessel- Karl Young

Segelschulschiff "Horst Wessel"

USCGC Eagle (WIX-327), formerly the Horst Wessel and also known as the Barque Eagle, is a 295-foot (90 m) barque used as a training cutter for future officers of the United States Coast Guard. She is the only active commissioned sailing vessel in U.S. military service, and one of only two commissioned sailing vessels, along with USS Constitution

Each summer, Eagle deploys with cadets from the United States Coast Guard Academy and candidates from the Officer Candidate School for periods ranging from a week to two months. These voyages fulfill multiple roles. The primary mission is training the cadets and officer candidates, but the ship also performs a public relations role for the Coast Guard and the United States. Often, Eagle makes calls at foreign ports as a goodwill ambassador.

The ship was built as the German sail training ship Horst Wessel in 1936; it served to train German sailors in sail techniques until decommissioned at the start of World War II. The vessel was given anti-aircraft armament and re-commissioned in 1942. At the end of the war, Horst Wessel was taken by the U.S. as war reparations.

brass plate HW

Eagle commenced its existence in  Germany as Horst Wessel, a ship of the Gorch Fock class. Horst Wessel was an improvement on the original design. She was larger in dimension and her spars were all steel, unlike Gorch Focks wooden yards. SSS Horst Wessel began life as Schiff (“ship”) 508 at Blohm & Voss in Hamburg, Germany in 1936.Her keel was laid on 15 February, she was launched on 13 June, completed on 16 September, and commissioned on 17 September. She was the second ship in the class to be built, following the class namesake Gorch FockRudolf Hess gave the speech at her launch in the presence of Adolf Hitler, and Horst Wessel’s mother christened the new ship with a bottle of champagne. The name was given in tribute to SA leader Horst Wessel, who had been accorded martyr status by the NSDAP.  He also wrote the song which came to be known as “Horst-Wessel-Lied” or”Die Fahne hoch” (“The Flag on High”) , which was later used as the NSDAP national anthem. Shortly after work began on Horst Wessel, the Blohm & Voss shipyard laid the keel of the German battleship Bismarck, which was labeled Schiff 509.

Horst-Wessel-1937-HWI02

SSS Horst Wessel served as the flagship of the Kriegsmarine sail training fleet, which consisted of Gorch FockAlbert Leo Schlageter, and Horst Wessel. (Mircea was also built in 1937 for the Romanian Navy, and work began on a fifth ship called Herbert Norkus, but was stopped with the outbreak of war.) Horst Wessel was commanded by Captain August Thiele, a previous Captain of Gorch Fock, and it was homeported in Kiel. In the three years before World War II, she undertook numerous training cruises in the North Atlantic waters, sailing with trainee groups consisting of both future officers and future petty officers. On 21 August 1938, Adolf Hitler visited the ship and sailed for approximately one hour before departing. Later that year, Horst Wessel and Albert Leo Schlageter undertook a four-month voyage to the Caribbean and visited St. Thomas and Venezuela. Along the way, they caught numerous sharks and turtles at sea and kept ducks enclosed on deck to provide fresh eggs.

Horst Wessel was decommissioned in 1939 with the onset of World War II, but served as a docked training ship in Stralsund for the marine branch of the Hitler Youth until her recommissioning as an active Navy sail training vessel in 1942. Numerous weapons were installed throughout the decks, including two 20 mm anti-aircraft guns on the bridgewings, two on the foredeck, and two 20 mm Flakvierling quad mounts on the waist. From late 1942 through early 1945, she sailed on numerous training deployments in the Baltic sea with cadets fresh out of basic training. On 14 November 1944, accompanied by Albert Leo SchlageterHorst Wessel was sailing in rough weather, when, near the island of RügenAlbert Leo Schlageter hit a mine that caused extensive damage to its starboard bow. Horst Wessel took Albert Leo Schlageter in a stern tow to keep her from running aground until larger ships could arrive the next day to assist.

Horst Wessel in front of Naval Academy Mürwik in Flensburg in 1937.

In April 1945, after the last German cadet class had departed, Horst Wessel departed Rügen with a group of German refugees on board. She sailed to Flensburg where Captain Barthold Schnibbe surrendered to the British, and the ship ran up the Union JackHorst Wessel was ordered to Bremerhaven and tied to a temporary pier, and much of its equipment was stripped. At the end of World War II, the four German sailing vessels then extant were distributed to various nations as war reparations. Horst Wessel was won by the United States in a drawing of lots with the Soviet and British navies, and requested by the United States Coast Guard Academy’s Superintendent. On 15 May 1946, she was commissioned by Captain Gordon McGowan into the United States Coast Guard as the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Eagle. In June 1946, a U.S. Coast Guard crew sailed her from Bremerhaven to Orangeburg, New York—through a hurricane—assisted by Captain Schnibbe and many of his crew who were still aboard. The German volunteer crew was disembarked at Camp Shanks and Eagle proceeded to her new home port of New London, Connecticut.

crew

 

 

Published in: on August 10, 2018 at 6:11 pm  Comments (2)  

Gisela Arendt, Swimmer – 1936

tumblr_oiuoudhVgM1tmsr3yo1_400.jpg

tumblr_oiuoudhVgM1tmsr3yo2_250.jpg

tumblr_oiuoudhVgM1tmsr3yo3_400.jpg

Gisela Arendt (5 November 1918 – 18 February 1969) was a German swimmer who won three medals at the 1934 European Aquatics Championships and two medals at the 1936 Summer Olympics. She also competed at the 1952 Olympics and finished seventh in the 4 × 100 m freestyle relay.

She won eight national titles in the 100 m freestyle (1933–1937, 1939, 1949) and 100 m backstroke (1934).

Her brother, Heinz Arendt, and son, Rainer Jacob, were both Olympics swimmers, and Heinz competed alongside Gisela at the 1936 Olympics.

tumblr_oiupe5bV911tmsr3yo3_540.png

Published in: on August 10, 2018 at 5:46 pm  Leave a Comment  

Holocaust Deniers, Unite!

The push to wipe us off the face of the earth, beginning with social media, is underway!

The grotesque “Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe,” 2711 meaningless concrete slabs that sit on 4.7 acres of prime real estate in the heart of Berlin’s tourism district reveals the terrible vengence Jews must extract for any attempt by Europeans to plot our own future.


By Carolyn Yeager

THE LATEST RUCKUS BEING STIRRED UP BY BELIEVERS is a letter to Mark Zuckerberg from a “coalition” of heads of global Holocaust museums and foundations with an “offer to help the Facebook CEO “battle Holocaust denial” on his social media platform.

For the letter-signers, battling Holocaust denial doesn’t mean the opportunity to meet doubters’ criticisms with irrefutable facts and documentary evidence that Jews really did experience during WWII what they claim. No, to them it means censoring, banning, removing all content that questions, contradicts or in any way belittles their official narrative of horrors that they have named “The Holocaust” or “The Shoah.”

That this is a specifically Jewish effort aimed at a Jewish multi-billionaire Internet mogul should be kept in mind—for it is not by chance. “The Holocaust” from the beginning has primarily assisted/benefited Jews and Zionists … it has primarily been spread by Jews and Zionists … thus the upholding of it is most important to Jews and Zionists.

So it’s only natural that the coalition that wrote the letter is comprised of Jews and Zionists. In this instance, they are mostly British-related. Ten are from UK Holocaust museums and trusts, 4 from South Africa, 3 from Australia, 2 from Canada, 1 from Hong Kong, 3 from the United States, 1 from Germany, and 1 from Brazil, making 25 in all.

Because these 25 individuals work for holocaust organizations does not make them real experts on holocaust. They are purveyers of holocaust more than experts. They earn big bucks for attracting visitors to their museums and raising money for the activities and publishing carried on by their pro-holocaust organizations. That’s why they’re all Jewish, or almost all—holocaust is really important only to Jews. When you ask the average man-in-the-street if he/she believes in the holocaust, they will probably say yes, but that doesn’t mean they know much about it. And that’s just the way these Jewish purveyors want it! They want simple believers who wouldn’t dare to question anything the holocaust “experts” say.

Holocaust deniers, however, have educated themselves about the actual claims and history of the Holocaust; that’s what turned them into deniers! I don’t know a single denier who takes that position because of hate or so-called antisemitism. All deniers used to be believers. We believed because we didn’t know there was another side. When the very convincing early revisionist research began to come into public knowledge in the 1980’s, the more curious began to ‘study up’ on the subject and a small movement began. How many of us there are today is unknown, but I would bet it is more than is generally thought – somewhere in the millions. Almost from the beginning, the holocaust purveyors and believers wanted to portray revisionists as evil so they could refuse to debate them on the evidence. No truly professional debate, with debate rules, has ever taken place as far as I know—only biased TV talk show confrontations that degenerated into appeals to emotionalism—and worse. Same with the very few court cases, which have now been outlawed by the believers.

I recently saw an opinion piece in the Washington Post that said Zuckerberg was right to allow holocaust denial because “a ban risks weakening our ability to defend the historical truth with facts and documentation.” Oh, don’t we deniers wish that believers would actually do that—respond to us with facts and documentation and allow us to respond in turn. That is what debate is. But no—we’re answered only with censorship and laws banning any mention of it! In the UK, holocaust denial is not illegal per se, but ‘hate’ is. So the game is to define holocaust denial, or even ridicule or skepticism, as an expression of racial ‘hate’ and prosecute people that way.

Free speech equals anti-Semitism?

Free speech is under attack everywhere. And it’s mainly from Jews. That’s just a fact. Jews are a highly criticized population group because of their well-known socially harmful behaviors. In order to stop that criticism, they use ‘anti-Semitism’ and because the benefits flowing to them from the Holocaust are so valuable, they have worked hard to connect holocaust denial to anti-Semitism. I usually write the word without the hyphen because Jews are only a small part of the Semitic peoples—therefore the word should really be anti-Jewish. But having always hated being called Jews by non-Jews, they coined the word anti-Semitism.

Let’s look now at the text of the letter to Mark Zuckerberg. It is filled with inaccuracies and false statements even though this is what it complains of about deniers posting on Facebook. For example: “Virulent antisemitism is a proven pathway that leads from rhetoric to violence.” This is not true. First, we know from the Old Testament that throughout history it has been Israelites who have virulently hated and attacked their neighbors. When Semites first ventured into Europe, they self-segregated themselves because they didn’t want to assimilate. They set themselves up in opposition to the local Christians whom they despised by engaging in usury and becoming ruthless tax and rent collectors for the wealthy landowners. The Christian European serfs were not allowed to harm the Jews in return and this created bad blood between them but nothing that could be called anti-Semitism, which is defined as ‘hating Jews for no reason.’ Since anti-Semitism doesn’t exist, a pathway from it to violence against Jews has never been ‘proven.’

The letter also says “History proves” that “antisemitism is the first unravelling of a society’s moral fabric.” Wrong. In fair and impartial history, there is much more evidence that when Jews gain influence in any society, that’s when the moral fabric begins to unravel. Zuckerberg himself recently had to admit to mishandling his Facebook users private information, exposing them to abuse.

Another falsehood in the letter is this: Antisemitism was the “first rung on the ladder of prejudice and discrimination that led to genocide—first against the Jews, then political opponents, homosexuals, Roma and Sinti people.” In the first place, there is no proof that genocide took place against any of those groups, and in fact it didn’t. But further, to claim that antisemitism (hatred of Jews) leads to prejudice and discrimination of other disfavored groups, and then genocide, is nuts. Many groups are not in favor at different times for different reasons, not just Jews. It’s completely without foundation to say that it always starts with Jews and then spreads to others (‘canary in the coal mine’).

Finally, they use the very left-wing Guardian newspaper and the Jewish Antidefamation League as their sources of information. “According to the ADL, ignorance and lack of education are the dominant source of antisemitic views.” This reinforces their fixed idea that “antisemitism” is the problem, and portrays “antisemites” as ignorant and uneducated people. “The Guardian newspaper reported a 34% rise in 2017 violent assaults against Jewish people and the number has again risen in 2018.” This means nothing since these ‘assaults’ (only a tiny fraction of which consist of any violence or touching) are reported by Jews themselves, are not properly investigated but just accepted, and since there are so few that a 34% rise could translate to only one or two more incidents, anyway.

Because they misrepresent us, our positions and arguments, we must always refute their misrepresentations in as aggressive a way as they come after us. Not name calling! Not by making fun of. But directly and with superior knowledge, keeping to the point. I see excellent refutations taking place on the Internet all the time–great work going on in comment sections! We need to keep up with the latest findings and also expose their pathetic reliance on “hate and antisemitism” accusations instead of bringing forth evidence and documentation they claim they have.

Work with us! Jews say to Facebook

Their “offer” is that their coalition will deliver “educational resources in multiple languages at no cost” to Facebook, with which it can “tackle hate and prejudice, teach empathy, understanding and respect.” (Why don’t they respect that others can have a different point of view on  Holocaust without their being evil or a hater?) They also have “thousands of shareable stories—some in interactive format.” (They utterly rely on ‘stories’.) So in other words, Facebook should become a Holocaust teaching site and use the coalition’s teaching materials to actually promote the Holocaust on Facebook! Wow. Somehow I don’t think Zuckerberg with take them up on it. They close with this: “We will contact your office to set something up.” It almost sounds like a threat.

Published in: on August 10, 2018 at 5:41 pm  Comments (3)  

Adolf Hitler on ‘Causes of the Collapse’, Part 3

MK_Dalton

Syphilis was a big problem in Germany at this time, before the use of penicillin to treat infections, which came only in 1942. Hitler spends some time in this long Chapter 10 discussing it and offering moral solutions. He blames prostitution and marriages based on financial considerations rather than love, which he calls “the Judaizing of our spiritual life and mammonizing of our mating instinct.” He recommends early marriage. He writes:

THE SIN AGAINST BLOOD AND RACE

The sin against blood and race is the original sin in this world. It brings an end to every nation that commits it.

[…]

The attitude towards this one vital problem in pre-war Germany was most regrettable. What measures were taken to halt the infection of our youth in the large cities? What was done to put an end to the contamination and mammonization of our love lives? What was done to fight the resultant syphilization of our national body? […]

Instead of taking this problem lightly, the authorities should have realized that the fortunes or misfortunes of future generations depended on its solution. […]

THE TASK OF COMBATING SYPHILIS

[…] A war against syphilis means fighting against prostitution, against prejudice, against old-established customs, against current fashion, public opinion, and last but not least, against a false prudery in certain circles.

The first prerequisite to be fulfilled before the state can claim a moral right to fight against all these things is the facilitation of earlier marriages for the coming generations. Whatever way we view it, late marriages have the sanction of a custom that is, and will remain, a disgrace to humanity. It’s a cursed institution, ill-suited to a being who likes to regard himself as in the ‘image’ of God.

[…]

Marriage is not an end in itself, but must serve a higher goal, which is to increase and maintain the species and race. … This being the case … early marriages should be the rule because only the young couple will still have the strength necessary for raising healthy offspring. Of course, early marriages cannot be made the rule without a whole series of social changes …

SOUND MIND ONLY IN SOUND BODY

First of all, our present educational system must establish a balance between mental instruction and physical training. The institution known today as Gymnasium is a positive insult to the Greek model. Our system of education entirely loses sight of the fact that, in the long run, a healthy mind can exist only in a healthy body. […] The … neglect of physical training necessarily leads to sexual thoughts in early youth.

[…]

Thus, in every branch of our education , the daily curriculum must occupy a boy’s free time in useful development of his physical powers. He has no right in those years to loaf about, becoming a nuisance in public streets and cinemas. […] Our school system should also rid itself of the notion that bodily training is best left to the individual himself. There is no such thing as freedom to sin against posterity, and thus against the race.

THE FIGHT AGAINST SPIRITUAL POISONING

[…] Our whole public life today may be compared to a hothouse for sexual ideas and incitements. A glance at the bill-of-fare provided by our cinemas, playhouses, and theaters suffices to prove that this is not the right food, especially for our youth. In shop windows and advertisements, the most vulgar means are used to attract public attention. Anyone who hasn’t completely lost contact with adolescent yearnings will realize that this must cause great damage. This seductive and sensual atmosphere puts ideas into the heads of our youth that, at their age, should still be unknown to them. It is much, much worse today! We have lost that battle.

[Our contemporary youth] mature too early and are therefore old before their time. The law courts sometimes throw a distressing light on the spiritual life of our 14- and 15-year-olds. Who, then will be surprised to learn that syphilis claims its victims already at this age. [Today it is opiods and heroin] And isn’t it deplorable to see the number of physically weak and intellectually spoiled young men , who have been introduced to the rites of marriage by the big-city whores? […]

Wilhelm Kriessmann, who grew up ia small village in Austria in the ’20’s and ’30’s, turned 19 in 1938, told me that even during the war if you had sex with a “nice” girl, you had better be prepared to marry her. So this did drive boys to prositutes … or abstinance.

[H]alf measures are worthless. … It’s a half-measure if incurables are given the opportunity of infecting one healthy person after another. This would be that kind of humanitarianism that allows a hundred to perish in order to avoid hurting one individual.

The demand that defective people be prevented from producing defective offspring is one that’s based on the most reasonable grounds, and its proper fulfillment is the most humane act of mankind. Unhappy and undeserved suffering of millions will be spared, with the result that there will be a gradual improvement in national health. […]

THE BOLSHEVIZATION OF ART

One of the most visible signs of decay in the old Reich was the slow decline of the cultural level. But by ‘culture,’ I don’t mean that which is nowadays designated as ‘civilization,’ which, on the contrary, may rather be regarded as inimical to a truly elevated standard of thinking and living.

At the turn of the last century, a new artistic element began to make its appearance in our world. It was something that had been previously unknown and foreign to us. In former times, there were certainly offences against good taste; but these were mostly departures from the orthodox canons of art, and posterity could recognize a certain historical value in them. But the new products showed signs, not only of artistic aberration but of a destructive spiritual degeneration. Here, in the cultural sphere, the signs of the coming political collapse first became apparent.

If we study the course of our cultural life during the last 25 years, we will be astonished to note how far we have already gone in this process of regression. Everywhere we find the presence of those germs that give rise to tumorous growths that must sooner or later bring about the ruin of our culture. Here we find undoubted symptoms of a slowly decaying world. And woe to the nations that are no longer able to master this disease!

SPIRITUAL PREPARATION FOR BOLSHEVISM

The saddest feature of our whole pre-war culture was not only that it was barren of any cultural or artistic creative force, but the hatred with which the memory of the greater past was besmirched and effaced. Around the end of the last century, people were less interested in producing new significant works of their own—particularly in the fields of dramatic art and literature—than in defaming the best works of the past, and in presenting them as inferior and outdated: as if this period of disgraceful decadence had the capacity to produce anything of superior quality.

[…] It threw the healthy artistic feeling into utter confusion, thus spiritually preparing the way for political Bolshevism.

In this connection, attention must be drawn once again to the lack of courage displayed by one section of our people, namely, by those who, in virtue of their education and position, should have been obligated to resist this cultural disgrace. But they failed to offer serious resistance, and surrendered to what they considered the inevitable. This abdication was due to a fear of the ruckus that would be raised by the apostles of Bolshevist art, who viciously attacked anyone not ready to acknowledge them as the crown of creation, and who strangled all opposition by calling it philistine and backward. People trembled in fear lest these half-wits and swindlers accuse them of lacking in artistic appreciation—[…]

MODERN MASSES OF HUMANITY

Still another critical symptom has to be considered.

In the course of the 19th century, our towns and cities began to lose their character as centers of civilization, and became more and more centers of habitation. In our great modern cities, the proletarian man doesn’t show much attachment to the place where he lives. This feeling results from the fact that his town is nothing but an accidental abode […] partly due to the frequent change of residence that’s forced upon him by social conditions; there’s no time to form a bond to the place in which he lives. And yet another reason lies in the cultural barrenness and superficiality of our present-day cities.

[…]

But the following is the essential point: Our great modern cities have no outstanding monuments that dominate the city, ones that could be pointed to as symbols of a whole epoch. Yet almost every ancient town had a monument erected to its glory. It wasn’t in private dwellings that the characteristic art of ancient cities was displayed, but in the public monuments, which were not meant to have a transitory interest but an enduring one.

[…]

The community per se is not the dominant characteristic of our contemporary cities, and therefore it’s no surprise that the community finds itself architecturally underrepresented. Thus we must eventually arrive at a state of desolation—with the practical effect that the individual citizen is totally indifferent to the fate of his city.

 

Published in: on August 9, 2018 at 12:28 am  Leave a Comment  

The Railroading Of Ursula Haverbeck

90-year-old political prisoner Ursula Haverbeck


By Carolyn Yeager

IN today’s reporting ON URSULA HAVERBECK’S APPEAL of her two-year prison sentence, DW finally got it’s facts straight about what Haverbeck said about the ‘Holocaust’ that was against the law in Germany.

Haverbeck is in prison now in Bielefeld serving her sentence. She was denied her appeal in May against the guilty verdict of “incitement” (disturbing the public peace) because she had claimed publicly “that Auschwitz was ‘not historically proven’ to be a death camp, claiming it was a labor camp instead.

Previously, DW has falsely reported that Haverbeck’s claim was that Auschwitz was not a concentration camp. What Haverbeck actually said was that Auschwitz was not a ‘death camp.’ DW confuses the two, and has repeated this in several articles they have published. I personally wrote to them telling them they were guilty of false reporting, sloppy journalism, and an attitude that when it came to ‘Holocaust’ they could say anything they wanted.

[Just yesterday, DW featured the most outrageous nonsense about Auschwitz in an article by Andrea Grunau (who seems to specialize in this garbage) who interviewed 84-year-old “gypsy” survivor Mano Höllenreiner in his home filled with expensive Bavarian antiques and oriental rugs. The number tattooed on his arm has brought all this to him. You can read it here.]

The Constitutional Court rejected Haverbeck’s appeal on the grounds that “Holocaust denial is not covered under the constitutional right to free speech.” Think about that. She cannot be found guilty of saying “Auschwitz has not been proven to be a death camp” because that is totally true. She can only be found guilty of saying something that is not covered by the “constitutional right to free speech.” In Germany, you are not free to question that Auschwitz was a ‘death camp’ because that is some kind of Holy Writ.

They tout “freedom of expression” for all citizens on every subject, except … except … except for the Jewish ‘Holocaust.’ The real reason for this is that the Federal Republic of Germany is an unconstitutional governmental construction that was put in place to UPHOLD the anti-German Nuremberg-Holocaust narrative. WWII has never ended for Germany–there is still no peace treaty, therefore Germany remains de jure under the control of the victors. The holocaust story is kept in place to keep Germans feeling too guilty and ashamed to rise up and retake control of their own country. It is pure indoctrination.

This special law (known as paragraph 130) in their psuedo constitution states that questioning/raising doubt about the Nuremberg-Holocaust narrative “disturbs the public peace.” What they mean is ‘disturbs the public’s acquiescence in our Big Lie.’ They cannot let the truth come out because it will blow their whole foundation for control out of the water. Therefore this exception in the law has to remain and DW reports that “ Germany’s highest court reaffirmed on Friday that Holocaust denial is not covered under the constitutional right to free speech,”

“The plaintiff’s remarks fall largely outside the protective scope of freedom of opinion.” Even though they’re true.

Then their article goes on to repeat the usual unproved statements: “6 million Jews were systematically murdered by the Nazi regime between 1941 and 1945.” And “An estimated 1.1 million people were murdered at the camp in Nazi-occupied Poland; 90 percent of the victims were Jewish.”

You see the circular movement here. They base the beliefs approved by the state on unproved war propaganda accepted in a military tribunal that was part and parcel of the war; then declare those assertions to be “obvious”—not needing to be proven (again) in court. Then they state those unproven beliefs as facts which cannot be publicly questioned without “disturbing the public peace.” Not very sophisticated; in fact, crude. But they put on red robes and sit on a high bench and solemnly state their legal finding.

Ursula Haverbeck, at 90 years of age, bravely challenges this unfree state of existence because she loves her country and her people. Will they allow her to speak when she fulfills her sentence? Probably not.

Downplaying Holocaust not always a crime

In a separate case in the Constitutional Court today, it was ruled that a man was wrongly convicted and fined for ‘incitement’ regarding Holocaust. The man had posted comments online that “downplayed the role of the German army in the Holocaust,” but in this case “his remarks were not deemed to pose a danger to public peace.” That means he didn’t get to the heart of the matter most sacred to the Jews, who are the reason behind all these elaborate legal maneuverings.

Published in: on August 4, 2018 at 3:54 am  Leave a Comment  

Holocaust Believers

Special guests are seated at the actual entrance to the former concentration camp at Auschwitz-Birkenau, colorfully lit up as a show-biz production for the 70th Anniversary remembrance ceremony in 2015.


by Carolyn Yeager

WHAT IS THE HOLOCAUST? It’s a belief, nothing more. If you try to get hold of it, touch it, find where it exists, you discover you can’t and it doesn’t. It’s words, it’s stories, it’s narrative. It’s more similar to religion than to history. The ‘history’ has been built up after the fact around the religion, or belief, to give it greater plausibility.

The Holocaust is a few photos from a few very selective places taken in 1945 after the Allies gained total control of the air and bombed the hell out of everything in Germany. They purposely disrupted/destroyed all communications and deliveries by road or rail, killed even farmers working in their fields, preventing food and medicines from reaching those in need. Many of those in need were in the detainment camps, where even the clean water infrastructure was destroyed by Allied bombers, such as happened at Bergen-Belsen where the worst pictures were taken. Naturally, epidemics broke out that the Germans were helpless to prevent or deal with. The result of this end-of-war bombfest was photographed and called genocide—not genocide by the Allies, which it was, but genocide by the Germans!

Have 6 million Jewish victims of this “genocide” ever been accounted for? Not even close. This number is simply repeated in newspapers, on television and in commentaries hundreds, or thousands, of times a day all over the world, thereby given incredible reinforcement as an undisputed “fact.” But the real fact is that it is disputed, and very powerfully disputed. Many documents are collected in this book alone that pull the rug out from under that number, showing it to have symbolic meaning for Jews, and nothing more. It was never meant to be taken literally until a huge case was undertaken to blame the defeated German foe for massive war crimes and sole responsibility for World War II.

When it comes to the fabled documentation, what the believers offer is mostly dishonest atrocity propaganda churned out by intelligence agencies and partisans during the war, faked documents and forced confessions produced for the “War Crimes” military tribunals after the war, and witness testimony that was never allowed to be questioned or cross-examined in court.

What the so-called deniers offer (their term for themselves is Revisionist) is a remarkable library of scholarly documentation called the “Holocaust Handbooks.” You don’t have to read all these books, or even one of them, to understand that the Holocaust is a religious-political belief, not a real historically documented event of the claimed proportions. But the books are available and highly informative, some with free access on the Internet, and more are in the works based on continuing research and investigation.

So I propose we adopt the term Holocaust believer for all those who automatically believe what they read in the media about holocaust and are shocked when they hear someone say they don’t believe it. Deborah Lipstadt is called ‘one of the world’s leading Holocaust scholars with a special expertise in Holocaust denial’ by the Jewish school that she works for–even though she has admitted, “I do my research on the internet.” As is typical with believers, her ‘expertise’ is accepted without critical investigation by both the media and general public– and even in academia. But Lipstadt doesn’t know anything about what happened to Jews during WWII other than what little she herself has read from Holocaust believers, and that’s why she refuses to debate with Holocaust deniers on principle. The only reason she gives for her refusal is that all Holocaust deniers are antisemites, no exceptions, and the Holocaust is a priori the ‘factual, objective truth’ and not open for debate. Defending that ‘objective truth’ will not be attempted.

Weak though the story is, all the believers out there just keep believingbecause they never hear anything else from the media-United Nations-global-world order conspiratorial control, with the power of World Jewry over government institutions thrown in for good measure. They should therefore be called what they are.

Published in: on July 29, 2018 at 3:47 pm  Comments (1)  

The Passing of American National Socialist Harold Covington

harold-covington-neo-nazi

by Billy Roper

‘The Old Man’ finishes his tour of duty.

A couple of weeks ago, Harold and I had ironically been discussing our health and joking about who would go first. He told me that he was seriously concerned about his medical condition. From all appearances he passed away from natural causes, probably from heart disease, in his apartment in Bremerton, Washington. He also dealt with other physical issues which challenged him.

Harold and I disagreed about the location of a future White ethnostate, but little else except, perhaps, the efficacy and utility of public activism. We were very cordial and civil to one another, especially in our private conversations. He and I discussed his past interactions with other movement leaders, whether rancorous or cooperative, as he sought psychological closure and confided in me. I had a great deal of respect for him for his lifetime of dedication to our movement and our people. He was a fellow member of the Balk Right, recognizing that the future breakup of the United States and the rise of White ethnostates is inevitable. He also upheld strong standards of character and behavior as a proud ‘purity spiraler’, opposing the inclusion of race mixers, Jews, and homosexuals in the movement, as well.

harold Rhodsia.jpg

His life was one of adventure and heroism, too, from his time as a volunteer in Rhodesia fighting against black Communist revolutionaries, to his open pro-White patriotism here in the United States for decades.

If you have not yet read Harold Covington’s books, you really should. Here is a link to them. He was a better writer than me, and I told him so. I don’t know if he believed I was being sincere or thought that I was just being diplomatic, but it was true.

haroldcovingtonobituary1

While it would be indiscreet of me to share our private conversations now that he is gone, here is our last public conversation, a Balk Right roundtable discussion which I think you’ll enjoy.

Rest In Peace, HAC. I’ll miss you. Who will help me keep these young kids straight, now?

Published in: on July 28, 2018 at 4:01 pm  Leave a Comment