“The Fatherland” Weekly

Very first issue of The Fatherland weekly dated August 10, 1914 appeared immediately after war “broke out” on July 28th following the assasination of the Austrian Crown Prince exactly one month earlier.

These ‘Fatherland’ magazines are an excellent way to learn the history and politics of WWI from a more German-friendly point of view, which we otherwise never see in mass media.  Credit for this goes to Pensylvania’s Villanova University and the ‘digital library’ project of its Falvey Memorial Library. All issues available in the Villanova link. A special thanks to Carolyn Yeager  for bringing this treasure to my attention.

In the very first issue, Viereck explained the purpose of “The Fatherland” magazine. On the first page of Vol. 1, No. 1, August 10, 1914, it reads:

PREAMBLE.

It is the purpose of this publication:

First: To place the German side of this unhappy quarrel fairly and squarely before the American people. Hitherto the American Press has offered its readers a quite amazing volume of anti-Teutonic prejudice in place of historical information. The fact that the German people are engaged in a desperate struggle for existence against Cossack aggression is absolutely ignored.

In the case of some papers this is due to a palpable, sinister and thoroughly disingenuous malice. But in the case of others it obviously springs from an honest misunderstanding. For years all European news dealing with German policies has come to America filtered through British, i.e. Prussophobe sources, and this out of sheer economy. The consequence is that Americans have not had a fair chance to form a fair judgment of the real issues. It is the aim of this publication to afford that fair chance by giving Americans the facts as Germans see them from the best available sources.

Second: To review, week by week, the actual events of the war so far as they can be authoritatively ascertained. Only the real unquestionable facts, as admitted by the governments will be given and the reader will not be confused by unsubstantiated rumors or fakes.

Third: To review, week by week, the attitude of the American press, to combat, as far as lies in our power, the misstatements and prejudices of the Slavophile [referring to Russia -cy] and the German-hater, to point out discrepancies and to protest against injustice towards a race that has rightfully earned the sympathy and admiration instead of the jealousy of the so-called civilized world for its industry, its art, its philosophy and its humanity.

The editors and contributors of “The Fatherland” are giving their services and their time in the interests of what they believe most sincerely and feel most keenly. It is impossible to read the mass of biased, misinformed and frequently venomous words that have hitherto been written on this topic without the utmost indignation. Hence this protest and endeavor for truth and justice so far as they are humanly within our grasp.

Published in: on December 9, 2018 at 5:15 am  Leave a Comment  

G. S. Viereck’s 1923 Interview With Adolf Hitler

By George Sylvester Viereck

“WHEN I TAKE CHARGE OF GERMANY, I shall end tribute abroad and Bolshevism at home.”

Adolf Hitler drained his cup as if it contained not tea, but the lifeblood of Bolshevism.

“Bolshevism,” the chief of the Brown Shirts, the Fascists of Germany, continued, gazing at me balefully, “is our greatest menace. Kill Bolshevism in Germany and you restore 70 million people to power. France owes her strength not to her armies but to the forces of Bolshevism and dissension in our midst.

“The Treaty of Versailles and the Treaty of St Germain are kept alive by Bolshevism in Germany. The Peace Treaty and Bolshevism are two heads of one monster. We must decapitate both.”

When Adolf Hitler announced this programme, the advent of the Third Empire [Reich] which he proclaims seemed still at the end of the rainbow. Then came election after electionEach time the power of Hitler grew. While unable to dislodge Hindenburg from the presidency, Hitler today heads the largest party in Germany. Unless Hindenburg assumes dictatorial measures, or some unexpected development completely upsets all present calculations, Hitler’s party will organise the Reichstag and dominate the government. Hitler’s fight was not against Hindenburg but against Chancellor Bruening. It is doubtful if Bruening’s successor can sustain himself without the support of the National Socialists.

Many who voted for Hindenburg were at heart with Hitler, but some deep-rooted sense of loyalty impelled them nevertheless to cast their vote for the old field marshal. Unless overnight a new leader arises, there is no one in Germany, with the exception of Hindenburg, who could defeat Hitler – and Hindenburg is 85! Time and the recalcitrance of the French fight for Hitler, unless some blunder on his own part, or dissension within the ranks of the party, deprives him of his opportunity to play the part of Germany’s Mussolini.

The first German Empire came to an end when Napoleon forced the Austrian emperor to surrender his imperial crown. The second empire came to an end when William II, on the advice of Hindenburg, sought refuge in Holland. The third empire is emerging slowly but surely, although it may dispense with sceptres and crowns.

I met Hitler not in his headquarters, the Brown House in Munich, but in a private home – the dwelling of a former admiral of the German Navy. We discussed the fate of Germany over teacups.

“Why,” I asked Hitler, “do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?”

“Socialism,” he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, “is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.

“Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.

“We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity.To us state and race are one.

Hitler himself is not a purely Germanic type. His dark hair betrays some alpine ancestor. For years he refused to be photographed. That was part of his strategy – to be known only to his friends so that, in the hour of crisis, he could appear here, there, and everywhere without detection. Today he could no longer pass unrecognised through the obscurest hamlet in Germany. His appearance contrasts strangely with the aggressiveness of his opinions. No milder mannered reformer ever scuttled ship of state or cut political throat.

“What,” I continued my cross-examination, “are the fundamental planks of your platform?”

“We believe in a healthy mind in a healthy body. The body politic must be sound if the soul is to be healthy. Moral and physical health are synonymous.” “Mussolini,” I interjected, “said the same to me.” Hitler beamed.

“The slums,” he added, “are responsible for nine-tenths, alcohol for one-tenth, of all human depravity. No healthy man is a Marxian. Healthy men recognise the value of personality. We contend against the forces of disaster and degeneration. Bavaria is comparatively healthy because it is not completely industrialised. However, all Germany, including Bavaria,is condemned to intensive industrialism by the smallness of our territory. If we wish to save Germany we must see to it that our farmers remain faithful to the land. To do so, they must have room to breathe and room to work.”

Viereck: “Where will you find the room to work?”

“We must retain our colonies and we must expand eastward. There was a time when we could have shared world dominion with England. Now we can stretch our cramped limbs only toward the east. The Baltic is necessarily a German lake.”

“Is it not,” I asked, “possible for Germany to reconquer the world economically without extending her territory?”

Hitler shook his head earnestly.

“Economic imperialism, like military imperialism, depends upon power. There can be no world trade on a large scale without world power. Our people have not learned to think in terms of world power and world trade. However, Germany cannot extend commercially or territorially until she regains what she has lost and until she finds herself.

We are in the position of a man whose house has been burned down. He must have a roof over his head before he can indulge in more ambitious plans. We had succeeded in creating an emergency shelter that keeps out the rain. We were not prepared for hailstones. However, misfortunes hailed down upon us. Germany has been living in a veritable blizzard of national, moral, and economic catastrophes.

“Our demoralised party system is a symptom of our disaster. Parliamentary majorities fluctuate with the mood of the moment. Parliamentary government unbars the gate to Bolshevism.”

Viereck: “Unlike some German militarists, you do not favour an alliance with Soviet Russia?”

Hitler evaded a direct reply to this question. He evaded it again recently [1932] when Liberty [magazine] asked him to reply to Trotsky’s statement that his assumption of power in Germany would involve a life-and-death struggle between Europe, led by Germany, and Soviet Russia.

“It may not suit Hitler to attack Bolshevism in Russia. He may even look upon an alliance with Bolshevism as his last card, if he is in danger of losing the game. If, he [Hitler] intimated on one occasion, capitalism refuses to recognise that the National Socialists are the last bulwark of private property, if capital impedes their struggle, Germany may be compelled to throw herself into the enticing arms of the siren Soviet Russia. But he is determined not to permit Bolshevism to take root in Germany.”

He responded warily in the past to the advances of Chancellor Bruening and others who wished to form a united political front. It is unlikely that now, in view of the steady increase in the vote of the National Socialists, Hitler will be in the mood to compromise on any essential principle with other parties.

“The political combinations upon which a united front depend,” Hitler remarked to me, “are too unstable. They render almost impossible a clearly defined policy. I see everywhere the zigzag course of compromise and concession. Our constructive forces are checked by the tyranny of numbers. We make the mistake of applying arithmetic and the mechanics of the economic world to the living state. We are threatened by ever increasing numbers and ever diminishing ideals. Mere numbers are unimportant.”

“But suppose France retaliates against you by once more invading your soil? She invaded the Ruhr once before. She may invade it again.”

“It does not matter,” Hitler, thoroughly aroused, retorted, “how many square miles the enemy may occupy if the national spirit is aroused. Ten million free Germans, ready to perish so that their country may live, are more potent than 50 million whose will power is paralysed and whose race consciousness is infected by aliens.

We want a greater Germany uniting all German tribes. But our salvation can start in the smallest corner. Even if we had only 10 acres of land and were determined to defend them with our lives, the 10 acres would become the focus of regeneration. Our workers have two souls: one is German, the other is Marxian. We must arouse the German soul. We must uproot the canker of Marxism. Marxism and Germanism are antitheses.

“In my scheme of the German state, there will be no room for the alien, no use for the wastrel, for the usurer or speculator, or anyone incapable of productive work.”

The cords on Hitler’s forehead stood out threateningly. His voice filled the room. There was a noise at the door. His followers, who always remain within call, like a bodyguard, reminded the leader of his duty to address a meeting.

Hitler gulped down his tea and rose.

Published in: on December 3, 2018 at 6:10 pm  Leave a Comment  

IN RUSSIA HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS LEGAL

ton-112818_thumb2

By Mike Walsh

Russian citizen Roman Yushkov has been cleared by a Russian court after being charged with making statements that in the West will earn him up to 5-years harsh imprisonment. After being cleared, the acquitted defendant poured out his gratitude.

“Dear friends, I hasten to inform you that an hour ago the jury cast a verdict by a majority of votes (5 against 3) that I am fully acquitted under Article 354.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ‘Rehabilitation of Nazism’.

The jury recognised that I had republished the article by Anton Blagin “Jews! Return Germans money for cheating about the Holocaust Six Millions Jews.”

And in his comments, he denied that six million Jews were killed by the Nazi government. However, as the jury found, there is no crime in his expressing this opinion.

146627_800 (1)

Photo near the court in the city of Perm.

Roman Yushkov went on to write; “Thank you for this, my honest Russian people. The jury also recognised my innocence by a majority vote (again 5 against 3), that I am ‘guilty of humiliating human dignity on the basis of nationality (Article 282) on an additional episode in my criminal case: for publishing the post headlined ‘Stop Feeding Strangers.’

What happened in the heads and hearts of the jury and generally around this verdict? God knows. This means that the judge can judge me only on Monday reconsideration on the verdict on the 282nd article, although the jury 7 against 1 felt that I deserve leniency on it. But this is secondary.

146066_800

The main thing is our common victory in the so-called Rehabilitation of Nazism laws. No matter how wild it sounds, it was the ‘rehabilitation of Nazism’ that they tried to hang on us for refusing to forget and reminding them of our much worse Russian holocaust and their forever worshiping the (alleged) Jewish Holocaust.”

The full horror of the Bolshevik horror is detailed in the heavily illustrated Michael Walsh books, Trotsky’s White Negroes, Slaughter of a Dynasty and Megacaust.

146401_800

The dissident went on to say, “The lying and unscrupulous religion of the Jewish Holocaust (in the West) has not yet passed to Russia.  Especially joyful is that the breakthrough occurred in my native Perm. Of course, this poisonous infection will come again and again.

 

“The prosecutor’s office can try to cancel this verdict of the jury in the appeal. But, we have to fight Jewish Nazism for our poor, long-suffering Motherland with a triple power, just as our grandfathers once fought against the Germans.  But today we won! Thank you to everyone who fought with us in a unified system.” ~ Roman Yushkov.

Murmansk historian Anton Blagin had earlier been charged with publishing an article headlined, “Jews! Return the Germans Money for Holocaust Six Millions Jews Related Fraud.”

His article went on to say: “The cult of the Holocaust is a real new totalitarianism worse than any Stalinist one. If they convict me now, then I certainly will not be the last. The priests of the religion of the Holocaust will taste the human meat, and they will not be stopped.”

The solidarity campaign behind the first persecuted holocaust denial defendant in Russia was launched at his suggestion.

zhidoboy-rossiya

“This is a struggle for the future of our children and grandchildren,” says Anna Sorokina from Irkutsk. She condemned those who had “cowardly decided to sit out, who dumped him (VK) from their list of friends.”

Holocaust Card

Her statement will not be lost on those in the West who abandon holocaust fraud investigators like Ursula Haverbeck (90), Ernst Zündel, Sylvia Stolz, Canadian musician Monika Schaffer, Britain’s Alison Chabloz, and many others imprisoned and heavily fined for saying what Russians are openly allowed to say.

 

Influence of Jewish lobby in Russia should not be underestimated. They use every opportunity to push their agenda, this time in a legal trial. It is their right, unfortunately, but it is not a policy of the state.

Published in: on November 29, 2018 at 8:47 am  Leave a Comment  

Three American Friends Of Germany During WWII

By Carolyn Yeager

A FRIEND SENT ME THE ARTICLE BELOW ABOUT ERNEST LUNDEEN, an American “isolationist” politician from Minnesota who had a fair-minded and truth-seeking attitude toward the German-Polish conflict and the war of September 1939. Through Lundeen, I’ve learned about a couple others who are also of particular interest to me. Lundeen served in the US House of Representatives from 1917 to 1919, when he was one of 50 Congressmen to vote against the U.S. declaration of war against Germany on April 6, 1917. For this reason he was not renominated by his Republican party. After switching to the Democratic Farmer-Labor party, he was elected again from 1933 to 1937 in the Roosevelt landslide. He then went on to become Minnesota Senator from 1937 until his untimely death in a plane crash on August 31, 1940.

Lundeen’s father, C.H. Lundeen was an early pioneer in South Dakota, where Ernest was born and raised. The Lundeens in the USA come from Norway and Austria, according to ancestry sites. Ernest Lundeen is what I would call a true American patriot.

The article appears at a German-language history website.

Senators Demand a Roosevelt Secret Diplomacy Investigation

On June 12, 1940, an English translation of the “Polish Documents on the Prehistory of the War” issued by the Foreign Office was published in the USA. (1) As mentioned above, the despatches of the Polish ambassadors in Washington, London and Paris, captured in Warsaw, were immediately declared “forgeries” by the US State Department immediately after their publication in Germany. The Polish ambassador, Count Jerzy Potocki, was even urged by Secretary of State Cordell Hull to make a public denial in the New York Times. (2)

At that time, few American politicians could get a complete picture of the contents of the secret documents. But after the businessmanRalph B. Strassburger bought 17,000 copies of the English translation and sent them to journalists, senators and governors throughout America, in the beginning of July 1940 a broad discussion emerged in the media. The Washington Post was the first national daily newspaper to dare to call the papers issued by the German Foreign Office authentic. Most other newspapers tried to downplay the importance of the documents. (3)


Who is Ralph B. Strassburger? 

A wealthy publisher and newspaper owner born in 1883 in Norristown, PA whose great-great grandfather Johann Andreas Strassburger emigrated to the USA from Ober Ingelheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, a little over 100 years previous. Interesting to me, Ralph (Ralf) Strassburger’s great-great grandmother was Eva Yeager, daughter of John Yeager (Jäger) and Eva Elisabeth Schneider, born in Pennsylvania. His grandfather was named Reuben Yeager Strassburger. (See here)

Strangely, everything written about him I have been able to find ends around 1920, even though he lived until 1959. It’s as though some of his activities in those last forty years, which include the above mentioned dissemination of the translated Polish documents which the US State Dept was compelled to label as forgeries, are covered up in joint agreement with his family. Strassburger was proud of his distinguished German ancestors and wrote a book of importance to historians and genealogists: Pennsylvania German Pioneers, published in 1934. Athough baptised by his mother, the former Mary Jane Beaver, in the First Presbyterian Church in Norristown, he followed the creed of his father, the old German Reformed faith. His father was a member of the Reformed Church of Schwenkville, and his great-grandfather was a minister in other reformed congregations.

1920 – Republican National Convention, Chicago, R. B. Strassburger and A. P. Moore (right). Chicago Daily News negatives collection,. Courtesy of the Chicago Historical Society.

Strassburger acquired residences in France in the 1920’s where he successfully bred and raced thorougbred horses until his death, after which his wife continued to do so.


On July 11, 1940, Ernest Lundeen used a Senate meeting to address the issue in the presence of Roosevelt. In a memorable speech he said:

“‘This is my war!’ was proclaimed in Paris in 1914 by the Russian ambassador Isvolsky.

“Our president could also exclaim ‘This is my war!’ when he looks at the catastrophe that threatens to engulf Europe’s culture today. Europeans have now expressed what Americans have long suspected: England, France and Poland would have settled their dispute with Hitler at the conference table if our president had not interfered. The Polish government would never have rejected thesensible proposals of the German leader if Ambassador Bullitt had not promised her the military support of England, France, and America.

Lundeen in his Senate office.

When the Germans conquered Warsaw, they discovered a multitude of documents in the archives. The most prominent among them are byWilliam C. Bullitt, our ambassador in Paris, and Joseph P. Kennedy, our ambassador in London. In front of me are photocopies of the documents the Germans claim to have found in Warsaw. I do not know if these documents are real or not. I hope they are fakes, but I’m afraid they are not. Rather, I fear they are real, and they feed on the reasonable suspicionthat our government has made secret commitments to the Allies.


“From these documents we can see that 
Mr Bullitt assured the Polish Government of America’s hostility to Germany. He also incited Britain to strengthen Poland’s resistance to Germany. This is of great importance because it was precisely this English action that was the main reason for the outbreak of the war. In a letter of March 29, 1939, Ambassador Lukasiewicz wrote to his Foreign Minister in Warsaw that Mr. Bullitt had urged our Ambassador Kennedy in London to liaise with British Prime Minister Chamberlainand ask him to give Poland a British guarantee. This helped decisively to the outbreak of war. Poland was reluctant and unwilling to accept the reasonable German demands. This made any peaceful solution to the Danzig and Corridor problem impossible. AndEngland and France went to war confidently because they believed they had the assurance of rapid American aid.“(4)

At the end of his speech, Lundeen demanded an inquiry by a Senate committee. Many prominent anti-interventionists – including pilot Charles Lindbergh, historian Harry Elmer Barnes, and Senator Gerald P. Nye – joined him.(5) [the following month Lundeen was dead! -cy] However, instead of examining Bullitt’s activities, there was only one investigation into the translation of the documents. That same month, the “House Committee on Un-American Activities” turned to the New York publishing house “Howell & Soskin” and there learned about documents from the German journalist dr. Manfred Zapp translated by the German-American writer George Sylvester Viereck.(6) Both Zapp and Viereck were arrested in the spring of 1941 for spreading “National Socialist propaganda”.

(1) The German White Paper: Full Text of the Polish Documents Issued by the Berlin Foreign Office. Howell & Soskin, New York 1940.
(2) “Berlin Accuses US: Bullitt Quoted as Saying ‘We Will Finish War on the Allies Side’.” In The New York Times vom 30. März 1940, Seite 1.
(3) Justus D. Doenecke Storm on the Horizon: The Challenge to American Intervention, 1939 – 1941. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2003, S. 76.(4) Ernest Lundeen, Six Men and War. Speech of July 11, 1940. Hoover Institution Archive.
(5) Justus D. Doenecke, Storm on the Horizon: The Challenge to American Intervention, 1939 – 1941. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2003, S. 76.
(6) House of Representative Special Committee on Un-American Activities Investigation on Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States. Third Session on H. Res. 282. Appendix – Part II. Washington 1940, S. 1054 – 1059.


Who was George Sylvester Viereck?

A German-American poet, writer and reputed illegitimate grandson of Kaiser Wilhelm I. He came to the United States with his parents in 1896 at the age of twelve. In college, he published his first collection of poems. He continued writing and publishing, gaining national fame. In 1908 he became a Germanophile and his support for Germany and pacifism caused him to be expelled from clubs and fraternal organizations. During WWI he edited a weekly magazine,The Fatherland. After the war, he was expelled from the Poetry Society of America. But in 1923 his popular-science book Rejuvenation: How Steinach Makes People Young brought him international success. He traveled through Europe, stopping in Munich to interview Adolf Hitler and became a well-known supporter of National Socialism. In 1933, Viereck again met with Hitler in Berlin and in 1934, he gave a speech to twenty thousand “Friends of the New Germany” at New York’s Madison Square Garden.

Viereck was convicted in 1942 for “failure to register with the U.S. Department of State as a National Socialist agent” when he set up his publishing house, Flanders Hall, in New Jersey. He was imprisoned for five years. Jews who are agents of Israel, or promote the interests of Israel to our government, are not found in violation of this Foreign Agents Registration Act. Funny how that works.


One thing that comes clear to me from this is that if you were a pro-British propagandist or writer during the war years from 1910 to 1950 or so, you were applauded, assisted and even funded by the governmental and media reigning powers, while if you were pro-German, or even recommended neutrality, you were under suspicion as an enemy of the state. The actual declaraton of war in both wars was just a formality. And little has changed in that regard up till today, whether we are “at war” or not. Germans get thrown in jail, blown up in plane crashes, and blotted out from history.

Published in: on November 27, 2018 at 8:31 pm  Leave a Comment  

JFK’s THOUGHTS ON HITLER

JFK-Hitler

“… you can easily see how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

jfk-diary-auction-exlarge-169

When JFK was writing about Hitler, his suicide had happened just four months earlier. It shows a side of Kennedy we’ve never seen before.

The young JFK was Germany, just months after the Allied victory. Already a scholar on global politics, Kennedy seems fascinated with Hitler and his place in history.

Kennedy gave the diary to his Senate research assistant Deidre Henderson, who published it in book form in the mid-’90s.

 

Published in: on November 22, 2018 at 8:38 am  Leave a Comment  

Reichserntedankfest-Thanksgiving

Reichserntedankfest_rally_1934

This is the Reichserntedankfest of 1934 in Buckeberg. That year, 700,000 people participated. Even those who did not support the NSDAP were totally blown away and emotionally shaken. They had never experienced anything even remotely like this, there was no rock concerts back then. It created spiritual feeling of sublime and unity among people who were participating. When they were marching back to their tents in the night, they could still see the huge spotlights piercing the sky in the Buckeberg. They were totally pumped up and fell that things are really going to change better.

The official purpose of the festival was the recognition of the achievements of the German farmers, whom the NSDAP called the Reichsnährstand (the Reich’s Food Estate). The celebration was also used by the NSDAP as a propaganda tool to showcase the connection between Adolf Hitler and the German people. The festival was part of a cycle of  celebrations which included the annual party rally at Nuremberg, Hitler’s birthday,  and other important events on the calendar.

 

Published in: on November 22, 2018 at 8:18 am  Leave a Comment  

NSDAP Anti-Tobacco Movement

German_anti-smoking_ad

The NSDAP banned smoking in restaurants and public transportation systems, citing public health, and severely regulated the advertising  of smoking and cigarettes. There was also a high tobacco tax, and supplies of cigarettes to Wehrmacht were rationed. Several health organizations in Germany even began claiming that smoking heightened the risk of miscarriages by pregnant women, now a commonly know fact.
* Image – A NSDAP-era anti-smoking ad titled “The chain-smoker” reading: “He does not devour it, it devours him” (from the anti-tobacco publication Reine Luft, 1941
Published in: on November 20, 2018 at 9:11 am  Leave a Comment  

Hermann Göring – Feldherrnhalle March

15th-anniversary-of-beer-hall-putsch-800x445

By Hermann Göring

In Bavaria the Party had already reached its zenith. At the same time the Bavarian Government Party considered that the time had come to exploit the general discontent with the Berlin Government: they would move to the attack and therewith split the Reich. Hitler himself was firmly resolved to prevent this happening and to use the disgust with Berlin to organize a united and general attack against the Government of the Reich as such. The events which led up to the so-called Hitler Putsch are well known and it would take up too much space to describe them here. On the 9th November, 1923, on the fifth anniversary of the shameful November revolt, it was planned to strike the decisive blow. Confidently trusting the solemn promises of von Kahr, Lossow and Seisser (Government, Army and Police), Hitler, in the night from the 8th to the 9th November, proclaimed the new Germany and declared the Government of the Reich to be removed from office. On the following day the march to Berlin was to have started. We know today that Herr von Kahr, as representing Catholic and Wittelsbach tendencies, had planned quite a different action for the 12th November. And so the movement, without knowing it, had, by its action, saved the unity of the Reich.

At about noon on the 9th November the first of the unarmed marching and singing columns of the fighters for freedom were treacherously shot down by the police near the Feldherrnhalle in Munich. Eighteen sacrificed their lives and many more were wounded. Beside Hitler marched General Ludendorff, and beside Ludendorff myself as commanding officer of the Storm Troops. Hitler and Ludendorff were saved as by a miracle. I myself fell, seriously wounded by two shots. Abruptly and brutally the rattle of the machine-guns had wrecked the rejoicings and had murdered the hope of freedom. Once more, as has happened several times in German history, treachery prevented victory. The young movement which had only just sprung up, seemed already destroyed. The followers were dispersed, the leaders in prison, wounded or in exile. To the weak, once more discouraged, it seemed as if Germany was now finally lost.

But it soon became clear that these sacrifices had not been in vain. The seed sown in blood began wonderfully to put out shoots. The fighters, the activities, were united more firmly than ever. Hitler himself was stronger, more experienced, more confident in the future than ever before. During his imprisonment the situation seemed hopeless. But he had hardly been released when the enormous attractive force of this leader and prophet became apparent. He took the banner into his own hands again, and immediately the old fighters gathered round him afresh and thousands of new ones as well. The movement was now established not only in Bavaria, but also in North Germany. With the march to the Feldherrnhalle in Munich the young movement had made its entry into world history, and had taken over the leadership and direction of the struggle for freedom, honour, work and bread which was now beginning. For the future no other organization could lay claim to the same position. It was a Middle-class Government which had given the order to shoot down the soldiers of National Socialism at the Feldherrnhalle. And therewith many honest German workers lost the last traces of mistrust towards the movement. The Middle Class parties could no longer take in the people with the lie that they represented the nation. At the Feldherrnhalle they had come out in their true colours, and there it was that National Socialism finally tore from the Bourgeoisie their distorted idea of Nationalism. In the same way the movement could no longer allow the Social Democrats to call themselves the representatives of Socialism. The Middle Classes had taken the sublime conception of Nationalism, which is to promote the good of the whole people, and had degraded it to jingoism, which has its roots in alcohol and in the winning of profits. In the same way the Social Democrats’ had taken the pure conception of Socialism, which means service to the community and the right of each individual to live a decent life, and had degraded it to a mere question of food and wages.

Germany was split into two hostile camps; on the one hand the Proletariat, and on the other the Middle Classes. The Middle Classes appeared as the representatives of Nationalism, hated by the workers as the symbol of compulsion and oppression; the Proletariat, hated and feared by the cowardly Bourgeoisie, appeared as the symbol of destruction and the abolition of private property. The two ideas seemed mutually exclusive and inevitably opposed to each other. lf the one side seemed to offend against the nation, then the other side offended against the people. There could be no bridge built between the two parties; there could be no reconciliation. Hitler saw that the distortion of these two ideas had brought about the division of the people, and that as long as they remained distorted no unity was possible. Therefore he took the symbols from both parties and melted them in the crucible of our philosophy to make a new synthesis. The result was National Socialism, which is the unique and indissoluble union of the two ideas at their deepest and finest. He explained to the workers that there can be no socialism, no socialist justice, unless one is prepared to recognize the good of the whole nation. He who would better the lot of the individual must be ready to better the lot of the whole nation. At the same time he convinced supporters of the Middle Classes that they could never achieve national strength and unity unless they were ready to grant each individual fellow-countryman his rights, unless they were ready to look upon the lot of each individual fellow-countryman as their own personal concern. He explained to both sides that Nationalism and Socialism are not mutually exclusive, but are absolutely necessary to each other. He thus combined both ideas to one philosophy, and he had then logically to bring the representatives of the two ideas together and to unite them and thus achieve national solidarity. And so it will always remain Hitler’s greatest merit that he did not bridge over the gulf between Proletariat and Bourgeoisie, but filled it in by hurling both Marxism and the Bourgeois parties into the abyss. Thus the ruinous war between classes and parties was brought to an end, and the unity of the nation and the solidarity of the people was achieved.

Published in: on November 20, 2018 at 9:00 am  Leave a Comment  

Interview Staff Martin Kerr

transcript of an interview between NEW ORDER Chief of Staff Martin Kerr and Rosmarie Macleod, host of the online broadcast The Voice of National Socialist Reason. This interview took place on November 4, 2018, on Mixlr, at https://mixlr.com/thevoiceofnsreason.

Martin Kerr at the NSWPP headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, 1981.

ROSEMARIE MACLEOD: Tell us a little bit about your background. How did you get involved in the Movement?

MARTIN KERR: I was born in Pennsylvania in 1952. May ancestors were of Scottish, English and German descent, and helped to settle the state. When I was three or four years old, our family moved to New Jersey. I grew up is a small White suburban community about 20 miles outside of New York City. I had a safe and comfortable middleclass existence. I attended public schools and the local Presbyterian church.

I first became interested in National Socialism in 1966, when I was 14 years old. I was aware, through reading the newspapers and watching the news on television, that American society was facing many problems, including racial unrest, the spread of communism and the war in Vietnam. It was also apparent to me that the solutions to these problems did not consist of those offered by democracy, capitalism or the churches – they were the very ones who had allowed the problems to arise in the first place! So I was casting about for solutions.

I read an interview with George Lincoln Rockwell and was very impressed by his honesty. Here was someone who was tackling the problems that we were facing – especially racial problems – in a direct and forthright manner. We didn’t use the term back then, but today we would say that he was “thinking outside the box.” I wrote to Commander Rockwell and asked him if I could join the American Nazi Party. Within a week I had received an answer in the mail, and I promptly signed up in the party’s youth wing, the National Socialist Youth Movement, which was the same as the Hitler Youth.

As you can imagine, my parents were unhappy with this development, and they prevented any further involvement by me in National Socialist politics for the time being. However, I kept my National Socialist faith, and by my junior year in high school I was attending meetings and demonstrations of the National Renaissance Party in New York City.

I was one on the founding associates when party commander Matt Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. In Commander Koehl’s last will, he indicated that he wanted me to follow him as the leader of the NEW ORDER. I have been in charge of NEW ORDER operations since his death in October 2014. I formally re-affiliated with the NSWPP in 1971. From 1973 through 1977 I served with the Los Angeles Unit of the party. From June 1977 until 1984 I worked at the party’s national headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. My primary responsibility there was public outreach, in particular, editing the party’s written publications.

RM: Different people have different definitions of National Socialism. What does it mean to you?

MK: There are different levels to National Socialism. What most people understand by the term is its superstructure, that is to say its outward policies and form. In that sense, National Socialism is a dynamic racial movement that seeks to safeguard and advance the interests and welfare of White people both here in the US and worldwide.

Using Hitler’s Germany as a model, the NEW ORDER seeks to create a National Socialist state for White Americans. Now, it is not the case that we are trying to replicate the Third Reich on American soil, in the sense of copying it identically in every little detail. Rather, our goal is to apply basic National Socialist principles in an American context, taking into account America’s history, its racial and ethnic demographics, and its geography, as well as the unique character of the American personality.

But underneath this political superstructure rests the philosophical basis of National Socialism, which does not change over time, or from one country to the next.

National Socialism is a worldview, or a Weltanschauung, to use the German term. We believe that the Universe is governed by natural laws. For Man to be healthy and prosperous, he must first acknowledge that these laws exist; secondly, he must discern what they are; and finally, he must follow them. This process is true both for individuals and for our race as a whole.

My good friend and comrade Povl Riis-Knudsen, the Danish National Socialist, has devised a one-sentence definition of National Socialism that serves very well: National Socialism is the application of the laws of Nature to human affairs.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER? What separates it from other pro-White organizations?

MK: The NEW ORDER is a vanguard National Socialist organization. Our doctrine is derived directly from Mein Kampf and other Hitlerian sources.

Here is what we are not:

• We are not White Nationalists;
• We are not White separatists;
• We are not Alt-Right;
• We are not Balk Right;
• We are not Christian Identists;
• We are not Satanists;
• We are not Identitarians;
• We are not National Bolsheviks or Strasserites

Our goal is to promote strict, hardline Hitlerian National Socialism, and not something else. We try to stay on good footing with other pro-White groups that are not National Socialist, and we wish them no ill will. Anything that moves White people in the general direction of National Socialism is worthwhile, in our opinion. But ultimately there is only one movement qualified to lead White people into the future, and that movement is National Socialism, embodied in North America as the NEW ORDER.

The NEW ORDER traces its organizational descent directly to George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, later renamed the National Socialist White People’s Party. When Commander Rockwell was assassinated in 1967, party leadership devolved to Matt Koehl.

As I mentioned earlier, Commander Koehl reorganized the NSWPP as the NEW ORDER in 1983. So our organizational history goes back some six decades.

Also, from our earliest days, commanders Rockwell and Koehl had contact with the remnants of the original Hitler movement in Germany, through comrades such as Arthur Axmann, Otto Remer, Gudrun Burwitz-Himmler, Bruno Ludtke, Hans-Ulrich Rudel, Winifred Wagner, Hans Baur, Florentine Rost van Tonnigen, Hanna Reitsch, Hans Severus Ziegler and others.

No other pro-White or National Socialist group has and organizational pedigree that even comes close to ours.

I mentioned earlier that we a “vanguard organization.” Our predecessor, the National Socialist White People’s Party, was designed as a mass-oriented political formation. The NEW ORDER, in contrast, does not seek to recruit the masses of people into its ranks, or much less to solicit their support in elections.

Rather, we are looking for a small number of highly motivated, exceptional people – an elite – who are fully committed to the National Socialist cause.

RM: What is the NEW ORDER’s stand on religion?

MK: The NEW ORDER is incorporated in Virginia as a non-profit religious organization. Our leadership views National Socialism as our religion. For us, the tenets of the National Socialist worldview fulfill all of the spiritual requirements for a new religious faith. Sometimes people refer to this as the Hitler Faith or Esoteric Hitlerism.

Our critics sometimes claim that we worship Adolf Hitler as a “god,” but this is a misunderstanding or deliberate distortion of our belief.

Our founder, Matt Koehl, put our perception of Adolf Hitler as follows:

There is but one Supreme Being, one Ultimate Source of all causation — one great Primal Power, infinite and eternal — which we recognize. We are all creations of this Power. Once in thousands of years, however, a singular and unique figure appears, whose special mission it is to declare anew the Divine Will and to redefine human history. In so doing, he himself becomes a universal symbol. In recent time, this extraordinary, providential figure appeared in the person of — Adolf Hitler.With his miraculous appearance, a new age on Earth has begun. That is why we honor and revere him. (Source: FAQ)

Thus our attitude towards Adolf Hitler is not one of “worship,” as the term is commonly understood, but rather one of veneration.

So, this is our belief. But we do not attempt to force our religious insights on our followers. How somebody views the Divine is up to them, it’s a matter of personal conscience. Everyone has to find their own path to God.

We have as supporters people who are Christians, or Odinists, or atheists. We even have a few Buddhists. Savitri Devi famously embraced Hinduism. As long as someone is an Aryan and they support National Socialism, they are welcome in our ranks, regardless of religious conviction. Religious intolerance and persecution are un-Aryan.

RM: Does the NEW ORDER have a plan? What is its strategy?

MK: For obvious reasons, we are not going to reveal our strategy to the public in any detail, but I can speak about it in general terms.

Broadly speaking, there are two different strategic approaches that hardline pro-Whites have utilized over the years: the mass-approach and the vanguard strategy.

The mass-approach consists on enlisting as many people as possible into the movement as quickly as possible. It is characterized by public demonstrations, publicity seeking, a high media profile and public name recognition. Little or no attention is paid to building a solid infrastructure, nor in ideological development, nor in quality control concerning those recruited.

The mass-approach results in a lot of publicity and attention, and in a relatively larger membership. But the organizations that adopt this approach normally do not last long. They are filled with infiltrators and other troublemakers. The publicity that they receive is almost always negative. Their average existence is about two years, after which they disband or fade away, only to be replaced by similar dead-end organizations. This is not the approach that the NEW ORDER is taking.

Instead, we are pursuing a vanguard strategy. This is characterized by slow growth and consolidation, by intensive theoretical development, and by careful attention as to whom we recruit. We have small numbers, a low public profile, and little engagement with the media. We spend most of our effort and resources is building a solid infrastructure. Our public activities are limited. Their goal is to spread our message as far and wide as possible among the broad masses of our racial sisters and brothers.

We have encountered groups which claim that they pursue both strategies simultaneously, that is, a mass strategy accompanied by intenstive infrastructutal development. But realistically, given the limited resources that pro-Whites have at their disposal, you cannot do both at once; you have to choose one to focus on.

Our mid-range goal is to create a nationwide network of local National Socialist communities, which we term folk strongholds. We will have more to say about this in the future. However, as I said before, we do not intend to broadcast our plans to the public. We prefer to boast about our accomplishments after they have been made – not beforehand.

RM: How can people help out if they support the NEW ORDER and its beliefs? Where can people go if they want more information on the NEW ORDER?

MK: The basic level of affiliation to the NEW ORDER is that of Registered Supporter. An RS is someone who states that they are in agreements with our beliefs and who agrees to pay a monthly financial pledge to help support our operations. They have to fill out a registration form which includes a postal address. The NEW ORDER is an organization that is based in the real world. We have no Registered Supporters who are anonymous, or who are only known to us online.

If someone still wants to support our work, but they do not want to make the formal commitment of becoming a Registered Supporter, one thing that they can do is to subscribe to out print publication, the NS BULLETIN. It has been published continuously since 1967.

Further information on our Registered Supporter program and on subscribing to the NS BULLETIN can be found at the “About and Contact” page on our blog. (About and Contact)

Some people want to support us by making a financial contribution. We are now in the middle of our Fall Building Campaign, the goal of which is to raise $5,000 above our normal income. Donations of any size may be made to our post office box address in the form of check, money order or well-concealed cash. Money orders are a good option for those who want to donate anonymously, but do not trust sending cash through the mail.


To hear the original broadcast of this interview, go to: https:///mixlr.com/thevoiceofnsreason/showreel/

Select “Sun 04 Nov 2018”

Published in: on November 14, 2018 at 9:30 am  Leave a Comment  

The Dangers of Ed-jew-cation

JG18S-721

By Quintus Sertorius

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Charles Yancey, 1816.

A people ignorant of their own heritage are doomed to be a servile people. Shorn of a deeper connection to their past, an ignorant people will likewise lose any responsibility for the future and will quickly devolve into pathetic sub-humanism, actuated only by base animalistic urges, lurid escapist fantasy, and instant gratification. Such a people are incapable of great achievements, and quickly become incompetent even with respect to their own self-interest. Ultimately, the continued existence of an ignorant people will be subservient to the whims of those who hold proudly to their history, the accomplishments of their forebears, and their culture. It is for these reasons that the jews have so thoroughly infested the academic institutions of White nations.

Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, 1789.

The jews have subverted the process of learning throughout White societies, and they perniciously attempt to make it as difficult as possible for individuals to learn by banning the distribution of books, attempting to censor the internet, and foreclosing conversation or debate on topics that do not meet with Hebraic approval. The depredations of the jews have turned our schools into ill-conceived multi-racial anthropology experiments that resemble something between a circus and a prison. Two generations ago, Revilo P. Oliver decried the fact that our schools no longer provided an education, but instead merely provided training – sadly our jew-controlled schools have reached yet another low. They disguise propaganda as knowledge, and inculcate a deleterious egotism in the student-victims, so that they react with moronic anger or arrogant disdain when confronted with the fact that there could be knowledge beyond their ken. The broad base of practical and theoretical knowledge that once nurtured the capacity for creativity unique to the White race is conspicuously absent from today’s thoroughly jew-infested educational institutions. Modern curriculums are surreptitiously designed and executed by jews to stifle the intellectual curiosity, the spirit of exploration, and the drive for self-improvement – all traits found in greater degrees among the White race, and sometimes called the “Faustian spirit” that propels us to the forefront of innovation and true human progress. Instead of developing the discipline and skills to support autodidacticism, the current kosher curriculums demand hyper-specialization which paradoxically encourages a narcissism of intellect, while at the same time instilling a mentality of helplessness in the immeasurably large areas of life outside the narrow field of hyper-specialization. This process produces automatons well suited to work that is, in reality, menial and unthinking but hidden behind byzantine complexity; a complexity that exists in large part to disguise the fact that the work is meaningless drudgery.

Our plague of jewish-trained over-specialized “experts” believe themselves to be at the pinnacle of human brilliance because they can stolidly recite sections of a corporate human resources policy, or follow the instructions for using a JavaScript library. Meanwhile, the very existence of real knowledge and true learning becomes forgotten. In their absence, formerly prosperous White societies coarsen and decay as hedonism and degeneracy supplant the rigor and self-respect needed for creativity to blossom. True enlightenment becomes unattainable – as has long been the plan of our implacable racial enemies, the jews.

We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated.” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol. No. 9.

What, precisely, can one expect to find in the brainwashing centers formerly known as schools? One need not look far for examples that make plain the insidious jewish role in subverting our educational institutions.  Recently, the University of San Francisco began offering a class called “Black-Jewish Relations.” Taught by a low-functioning jewess and a living fossil whose credentials include four years in prison for seven drug and weapons convictions, student-victims can shackle themselves with debt in order to hear Yiddish poems about “Whiteness,” and share their “personal recollections of prejudice and discrimination.” Needless to say, in the California failed-state the classroom is packed with a sullen mob of opportunistic Asian termites and Mestizo scavengers, and even an Israeli zookeeper likely wondering when this pack of feral non-Whites will be sufficiently trained to release into unsuspecting, apathetic White communities.

We will establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress. We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory. In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it to a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political…” – Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 5.

The institutions that once formed the foundation of our White societies, and once existed for the benefit and advancement of White nations, have been corrupted by kosher connivance into the very tools being used to eradicate us from our homelands. Nowhere is this more evident than in our schools. The most vulnerable members of the White race, our children, are offered up as free-range victims for the violence of the dangerous, civilizationally incompatible sub-human sewage that floods our schools in the name of “diversity.” Education has degenerated into a system of indoctrination promoting jewish aggrandizement and White hatred. It consumes the most impressionable, idealistically-driven, and energetic years of our youth; it cannot be foolishly entrusted to the rabidly anti-White jews, no matter how disingenuously they pretend to be educational “experts.” The only fields of jewish expertise are usury, lying, and White genocide. It is our responsibility to protect the future of our race from these toxic, Judaic influences. We must constantly prepare ourselves so that we are able to counteract the jewish malignancies that have turned education into a weapon that destroys White minds and enervates White souls. We must not allow our children to be saturated in the jewish promotion of degeneracy, deviancy, and miscegenation for twelve years in what are ostensibly called schools. We must stop the jewish-orchestrated White genocide.

Published at http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-dangers-of-ed-jew-cation/

Published in: on November 12, 2018 at 8:12 pm  Leave a Comment